Sunday 01 October 2023
Select a region

Chief Minister ‘ignored’ Foreshore warnings

Chief Minister ‘ignored’ Foreshore warnings

Tuesday 16 January 2018

Chief Minister ‘ignored’ Foreshore warnings

Tuesday 16 January 2018

The Chief Minister was warned about “aggressive action” against Foreshore property owners more than a year before the issue was publicly raised, but failed to act, Express has learned.

The Law Society’s Property and Conveyancing Sub-Committee wrote to Senator Gorst in July 2016, demanding answers on the controversial foreshore issue. But while receipt of the letter was acknowledged, the Chief Minister did not respond or appear to take the matter any further.

The policy to ‘tax’ coastal property owners if their property encroaches on the sea wall or the ancient and vaguely-defined Foreshore hit headlines in July last year when Express revealed that one islander had been forced to fork out more than £30,000 in ‘compensation’ to the States when he tried to sell his former home.

roche de la mer foreshore alan luce

Pictured: One islander spent more than £30,000 on Foreshore 'tax' on this property.

Despite not being responsible for the encroachments – the property was built as such by previous owners decades earlier, with full planning permissions – he was still made to pay. 

In the following 18 months, the States collected more than £70k in revenue from similarly positioned coastal properties up for sale or development – despite not having published an officially sanctioned policy. This didn’t come about until December 2017. 

Since then, islanders and politicians have expressed their strong discontent with the policy, calling for it to end, with Infrastructure Minister Deputy Eddie Noel, whose department enforce the policy, left to answer questions.

It has now emerged, however, that the Chief Minister was called upon by senior lawyers to stop the issue from getting any further in July 2016 – as much as a year before the topic entered the public arena.

Members of the Law Society’s Property and Conveyancing Sub-Committee penned a letter to Senator Gorst demanding a meeting about the controversial subject. 

In their letter, which has been viewed by Express, they complain that the principle of approaching property owners in such a way is unfair, and expressing concerns over the decision only to "target" those selling or developing their land. They said that, while making a brand new developer intending to profit from the sea wall pay up, they saw little reason to target individuals and their family homes.

A response to the letter was sent, confirming receipt and claiming that advice would be sought before a full response being given. A full reply was never received.

Express asked Senator Gorst if any actions were taken, including discussing the letter's contents with the Infrastructure Minister, following the letter. Answers on this were never provided. A spokesperson for the Chief Minister's office simply responded: “We acknowledged receipt of the correspondence in question, and a policy regarding this issue has subsequently been published.”


Sign up to newsletter



Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by Davey West on
An interesting conversation this Sunday with friends on the subject of who to vote for in the coming elections brought some deep answers.
One of the most relevant and obvious was " voting for a politician that may have taken unpopular decisions but had the peoples' best interests at heart " which we basically agreed with.
Does charging innocent people large sums of money, that have purchased houses with planning permission fully granted, then ignoring a letter from lawyers on behalf of the recipients of these wrongdoings', count as fair and decent treatment of home owners. After all the Queen returned the right ( with sea wall encroachments agreed and rubber stamped by her office ) for the enjoyment of islanders, not to rip them off. A fail for Eddie Noel and as this article now reveals Ian Gorst. They put taking money from islanders their number one priority way above fair and reasonable policy. Are the Esplanade Office blocks all rented out showing a healthy return Chief Minister after you fully backed the development. If not why not ? Another example of greed using public assets.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?