Thursday 29 October 2020
Select a region

Loophole whistleblower hounded by taxman

Loophole whistleblower hounded by taxman

Tuesday 16 June 2020

Loophole whistleblower hounded by taxman


The businessman behind the tax loophole tip-off that ultimately led to the end of Jersey's fulfilment industry is now facing bankruptcy after losing a battle with the taxman.

Founder of music business Delerium Mail Order Richard Allen (56) saved the British taxpayer up to £200m a year by calling out a loophole involving a Jersey tax relief.

LVCR allowed items less than £18 to be sold to the UK free of VAT – a provision that some businesses exploited by shipping goods from Portsmouth to St. Helier and then back to the mainland.

He initially tried to expose the issue by writing to then-Chancellor Gordon Brown in 2005 and then in 2006 to HMRC, which maintained the provision was legal and refused to act.

hmrc.jpg

Pictured: Mr Allan owes HMRC £125,000 after losing a legal case in the High Court.

It wasn’t until 2012, after years of campaigning by Mr Allen and the threat of the European Commission stepping in, that HMRC removed the Channel Islands relief.

With his own business having fallen apart in 2007 due to the loophole, Mr Allen launched a legal case against HMRC claiming that he should be entitled to compensation.

However, he lost the battle in April 2019 and is now being chased for £125,000 - £72,000 in legal costs, plus the costs of a request he once made under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Law.

The High Court judgment, he says, has left him on the cusp of bankruptcy – something Conservative peer Lord Leigh described as a “gross injustice” to The Times.

Instead, he argued there should be a reward for Mr Allen, given his work to “expose the shortcomings of the current system”.

HMRC operates an informants' scheme, which allows whistleblowers to be rewarded for their efforts, but Mr Allen was denied a prize when he applied.

A HMRC spokesperson commented: “We are currently engaging with Mr Allen to agree costs with the aim of avoiding any further involvement of the court. We always consider individual circumstances and ability to pay before taking any steps to recover our costs.”

Sign up to newsletter

 

Comments

Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

There are no comments for this article.

To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?