Friday 26 February 2021
Select a region
News

Consultation shows divisions over South Hill's future

Consultation shows divisions over South Hill's future

Monday 16 November 2020

Consultation shows divisions over South Hill's future


Plans to redevelop the Government’s South Hill Offices will be amended to give equal weight to tourism, accommodation and cultural uses.

The changes come after a public consultation on the brief for the site was published, with the Minister for Environment stating he would ensure that its potential use for the tourism industry was properly considered.

Although a report outlining the consultation responses notes that some “respondents wished to see mixed uses, hotel, sports and culture with links to Fort Regent”, there was a divide over those who wanted to see it as a hotel, with 39 (50.65%) disagreeing that the site should be used as tourist accommodation.

John-Young.jpg

Pictured: Environment Minister John Young argued that "the maximum return in the release of this public asset should be secured" if it was housing.

The question of whether the site should be used for open market housing, as per the original briefing, divided respondents though, with 34 (44.74%) agreeing, 31 disagreeing (40.79%), and 11 (14.47%) remaining neutral. 

Many responses felt that the need for social housing and first-time buyer homes was of a higher priority, despite recognising the high value nature of the site. 

However, the Minister did not change his stance, stating that there were other sites planned for redevelopment that would “better contribute to the provision of affordable housing.”

On the structure of the building, respondents were predominantly in favour of the site remaining at its current height sitting within the hill, with 52 (67%) agreeing – The Minister agreed with this but said he wanted greater clarity in the subsequent height assessments. 

Final comments from respondents published included a suggestion that St Helier could be akin to “the waterfronts of Sydney, Capetown and Vancouver with their blend of housing, hotels, restaurants, shops and bars.”

Another commenter looked to more rural comparisons, saying “a small ‘village’ of hillside cottages… would sit beautifully nestled in the hillside”, drawing comparisons to Devon and Cornwall. 

The amended Supplementary Planning Guidance will be published at a later date. 

Last month, the Government Plan suggested that any funds from the sale of public assets like South Hill should be ring-fenced to reduce the Government’s covid debt. 

Sign up to newsletter

 

Comments

Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by Denise Shrives on
Oh! for goodness sake ! any spare land should have a mix of social and first time buyers first then if any space left, for sure go ahead with recreation needs especially a new indoor pool for rehabilitation as I understand that the new hospital will NOT have a pool.
Posted by IanSmith97 on
For heaven’s sake, what flaming tourist industry? Every time I hear about that my heart sinks. We have got to realise tourism ain’t what it was in the glory days and never will be again, it’s over. Our tourism is mainly weekends, short breaks and people coming to stay with families. The two week holiday is over here. In these straightened economic times this land should be used for the purpose which gives us the best financial return. If that is tourism, so be it, if it is housing so be that.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?