Sir David was seeking €100,000 in damages and a ban on further performances of the small hall play.
However, the Financial Times reported that the court ruled instead that the artist’s right to free expression outweighed any harm caused to Sir David, with the defence accusing him of having “excessive sensitivity” and an “exacerbated taste for secrecy”.
The play was performed at the 150-seat “Theatre de Poche” (“pocket theatre”) in Paris up until March this year and depicts “the irresistible rise of two Scottish immigrants.”
He must now pay around €56,000 in damages to Mr Tillette de Clermont-Tonnerre, the playwright’s publisher, and the theatres that backed the production as compensation for potentially damaging their reputations.
Sir David will also have to pay for a statement to that effect to be published in two French newspapers and two magazines.
Mr Tillette de Clermont-Tonnerre celebrated the court case’s outcome on social media by expressing his relief and thanking those who supported him.
According to Mr Tillette de Clermont-Tonnerre’s lawyer, success in “quieting a voice that displeased him” would have had wider implications for artistic freedom. He lauded the “very severe decision against Mr Barclay”.
Sir David’s lawyer, Christophe Bigot, said his client would likely appeal the ruling.
Pictured top: The Barclay Brothers (Photo credit: James Fraser).