The Government recently published a revised version, in which the size of areas protected under the plan were reduced from 27% to 23% of Jersey’s territorial waters following consultation with the fishing industry.
Environment Minister Steve Luce argued that the new plan struck a “balance”.
Pictured: Environment Minister Steve Luce said the decision to reduce the size of the protected area was made after further consultation with concerned fishers.
A number of individuals and organisations have already shared their views with the Scrutiny panel ahead of the 30 August deadline for submissions.
Jersey Marine Conservation said it broadly supported the plan, but chair Kevin McIlwee stressed the need for “robust” science-based decision-making and effective enforcement of marine protected areas
“The Island correctly declared a climate crisis and that situation has not changed. In reality, the lack of effective action has placed us in a position of mitigation not eradication.
“The government needs to act as quickly and as effectively as is economically possible,” he said.
While some fishers have criticised the plan for endangering their livelihoods and the industry’s future, the Jersey Recreational Fishing Association has instead criticised it for favouring commercial interests over environmental protection.
Scallop divers have also raised concerns about the impact of dredging on underwater habitats and argued current restrictions are inadequate.
HAVE YOUR SAY…
The revised Marine Spatial Plan is set to be debated in the States Assembly this autumn after the Scrutiny review is completed.
Those interested in sharing their voice with the Scrutiny panel can email a.thorne2@gov.je
READ MORE…
EXPLAINED: What’s the Government’s latest plan for protecting the marine environment?
Marine-protected area reductions give fishers “hope for a future”
New plans for Jersey Marine Park to cover third of territorial waters
EXPLAINED: How Jersey plans to manage 800 sq miles of coastal territory