Sunday 01 October 2023
Select a region

Complaints process begins in ‘Foreshore tax’ row

Complaints process begins in ‘Foreshore tax’ row

Tuesday 09 January 2018

Complaints process begins in ‘Foreshore tax’ row

Tuesday 09 January 2018

A man who was forced to pay more than £30,000 plus legal costs to the government when he tried to sell his former home has made a formal complaint to the States.

Islander Alan Luce (60) hopes that the complaint will be the first step towards ending a controversial States policy which has seen islanders fined tens of thousands for property encroachments on public land – even if they are not responsible.

Mr Luce, who lived along the St Clement’s coast, was told to pay a five-figure sum just as he was on the verge of selling his property in 2016 because parts of his it lay on a disputed piece of land known as the ‘Foreshore’ – the zone between high tide and low tide. It used to belong to the Queen, but passed into ownership of the Public of Jersey as a gift from Her Majesty in 2015.

But the property was already situated on the now publicly-owned seaside strip when Mr Luce bought it more than 10 years earlier.

He spoke out about the ordeal for the first time to Express in July, describing “bullying” and “belligerent” letters from Jersey Property Holdings, the part of the Department for Infrastructure responsible for dealing with encroachments on public land.

alan luce foreshore

Pictured: Mr Luce (here with his beloved Newfoundland dog) said that he disliked the tone of the letters from Jersey Property Holdings.

According to Mr Luce, not only did the saga lose him potential buyers and swipe thousands off the value of his home, but also caused him levels of stress that were detrimental to his health.

He also expressed concerns that some of his personal and financial details had been shared with others in correspondence by JPH and that errors were made in the final contract to sell his home. 

Following the revelations, Express learned that the States had earned more than £70,000 through the pursuit of islanders with encroaching properties. Numerous States members have since spoken out against the measures and questioned the Minister for Infrastructure about the policy during States sittings.

Heartened by a strong public backlash, which has seen many dub the fine policy as a ‘Backdated Foreshore Infringement Tax’ on social media, Mr Luce has now submitted a formal complaint to the Deputy Greffier.

foreshore politicians labey maistre bree

Pictured: Grouville representatives Deputy Carolyn Labey and Constable John Le Maistre and St Clement Deputy Simon Bree - all of whom represent affected parishes - have asked questions in the States about the controversial 'tax'.

The Minister for Infrastructure, Deputy Eddie Noel, will now be asked to compile a report for the Chairman of the States of Jersey Complaints Board, who will determine whether the case justifies a hearing. If so, the Minister and Mr Luce will both be called before a panel to give evidence in the next three months. 

Mr Luce isn’t the only person looking to challenge the policy. Grouville Deputy Carolyn Labey, whose parish is largely affected, has previously expressed disappointment over the approach taken against her parishioners. She is hoping to bring a proposition to the States to scrap the encroachment policy this year. 


In-depth: The man who paid £30k to the States just to sell his house

Sea wall row: States rake in £70k in just 12 months

Q&A: Everything you need to know about the Foreshore issue

Sign up to newsletter



Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by Peter Huntingdon Bewers on
I feel sorry for the person in question, but his property buts right up to the Sea Wall which is Public Property and The Public generally have ' Right of Way ' to Walk on if they choose ? so I feel this one is tricky, I would like a full explanation by my Solicitor if I was buying this property to check that I partly owned the Sea Wall and could close it off to the general Public , although looking at the Property I can see why the owner wishes to retain exclusive rights to the Beach , together with his own Granite Steps .
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?