Select a region
Multiple rows that left Jersey and Guernsey on the brink of all-out "political civil war within the archipelago" have been revealed in a debate that saw a bid to get the islands working together on a shared energy future shot down.
Many Deputies took the opportunity to air inter-island "dirty laundry", with one representative going so far as to say that, given half a chance, Jersey will eat your "breakfast and your lunch".
Express recaps the best (and worst) moments of the debate...
Guernsey politicians were being asked to approve a review that would explore the benefits of greater collaboration between Guernsey Electricity and Jersey Electricity – and the potential merger of the two utility companies.
The move, they argued, made economic and practical sense as both explored a sustainable way forward for powering the islands in future – with a particular focus on offshore wind.
But, following a heated debate, the idea was voted out 18 to 20.
A great focus was put on the historically difficult commercial relationship within the Channel Islands Electricity Grid, which is a joint company developed between Guernsey Electricity and Jersey Electricity to operate underwater power cables.
Deputy Al Brouard was the first to highlight historic issues with pan-island working. He approached Guernsey Electricity Limited (GEL) to learn more about previous issues with the GJ1 cable between Guernsey and Jersey.
When the cable was on the verge of failing "in 2015 GEL and JEL contributed to the repair, but JEL capped the amount it was willing to pay rather than its liability under the CI agreement"said Deputy Brouard.
"In 2018, GEL paid for the repair and there was no contribution from JEL – they refused to pay their share after the work in 2015.
"In 2019 JEL paid for the replacement cable in accordance withthe terms agreed under the revised CIEG arrangements, however JEL expected a compensation payment for the repair costs of 2015 before giving their consent to replace – and so on and so forth."
He then went on to highlight how this back and forth highlights a tortured relationship with Guernsey's counterparts across the water.
"What was the attitude of Jersey States and JEL when we had issues when the cable was failing – was their response a) do everything they possibly could to facilitate a licence to land a replacement cable and help us or was it b) doing everything they possibly could to delay, frustrate and drag fishing licences into negotiations?
"It was b), wasn't it?"
Pictured: Deputy Brouard.
He continued: “It took four years to get a fee per licence that the professionals advise me could have taken four months, we would have had a cable in place before GJ1 one failed... this delay also meant that when we went to the market to buy a cable we were buying it in a distressed position because we really needed it.
“[This left us] running the generators at St. Sampson's for an extra seven months, costing the island an extra £1 million a month. That's from our cousins in Jersey helping us when our cable failed. And we have a proposition here that we want to work closer?”
Later, Deputy Peter Roffey, the President of the States Trading and Supervisory Board, who has oversight of GEL, said while he doesn’t condone airing “dirty laundry” the decision being asked of the Assembly was too big not to.
Pictured: Deputy Roffey said, “I regret to do this, but we’re being asked to down such a big fundamental route... so I’m going to have to".
Deputy Roffey continued: “I agree with those that say there are areas for working together. The Channel Island Electricity Grid... has given us better purchasing power, but the work underneath? My goodness it has been difficult.
“The cable between here and Jersey has significantly more capacity than we are licenced under the CIEG to actually takethrough to Guernsey – this was done originally because the interconnector between Jersey and France only had limited capacity and that was seen as Guernsey's fair share.
“Now, extra capacity has been put in between Jersey andFrance, and we've asked, ‘Well, why can't we take more through the onward cable to Guernsey?’
"The door closed in our face, and it means more electricity has to be generated in Guernsey at more cost. It is not a good working relationship.”
He then referred to an incident where Jersey bargained with Guernsey for a fresh cable between the island.
“We were being told if you want your fresh cable, we want our fishing fleet to have access to the whole of Guernsey waters. That was what's being demanded in return.
"And it was only Deputy Ferbrache reading the riot act and saying that these demands would lead to what would virtually be the local equivalent of a political civil war within the archipelago that eventually got them to back down.
"That was the mindset."
And it wasn’t only the past relationship in electricity generation that came under fire, Deputy Andy Taylor said he has seen first hand how difficult things can be during his short time in government.
He commented on his cross-island work on the Cyber Emergency Response Team.
“What I had established is that we were working very hard with Jersey and we were working towards a common goal.
"They change their mind and I won’t say where they left us, but it was in something very smelly, and we've had to do extra work to get the project back on track."
He added" “I think that both islands really, really need to have their backs to the wall in an even worse financial situation before we'll actually start working together properly.”
Many in the Assembly did however support the idea of more collaboration, with many hoping for a future with a better relationship.
Deputy Neil Inder said that he genuinely thinks there is a want for the islands to work better together.
“Having met some of the senior politicians in Jersey I genuinely think there is a desire for us to work together,” he said.
“What I often find is that it’s officers potentially who don't want to, and I'm reminded by Deputy Trott of some very salient points, that Jersey will eat your breakfast and probably your lunch as well if they get a hold of it - but hope springs eternal!
“I do believe that our islands should work together more often.”
This is just latest in a long series of flare-ups in Jersey and Guernsey's relationships.
One of the most damaging moments for inter-island cooperation came during the early stages of the pandemic.
Despite there being a joint Channel Islands pandemic preparedness strategy, the two islands ended up taking distinctly different approaches to the management of covid-19.
Having worked on a joint pandemic strategy, the two islands took separate approaches to the management of covid-19, with Deputy Peter Ferbrache - who later became the island's Chief Minister - making critical comments about Jersey’s decision-making while still a backbencher in 2020.
Chief Minister Senator John Le Fondré hit back at the remarks at the time as “emotional and ill-informed”. Months later he said managing the pandemic was "not a competition".
Video: Senator Le Fondré responding to criticism from Guernsey over the island's handling of the pandemic.
But tensions weren't only present on the topic of pandemic management - in April 2020, disagreement over how pan-island competition watchdog CICRA should be run led Jersey’s Government to “terminate” its operations and set up its own single-island authority, the JCRA.
Former Guernsey Chief Minister-turned-backbencher Deputy Gavin St. Pier has on several occasions floated the idea of a joint Channel Islands CEO, but the suggestion has never been taken up.
The most recent example of the islands (lack of) collaboration came when it emerged that Guernsey didn't tell Jersey it was planning to purchase a ferry for Condor.
This was despite the two islands apparently previously "working closely" on improving sea links.
Push to start talks on shared energy future for Channel Islands
Could first electrons from French offshore project spark Channel Islands into life?
Jersey could have wind farm "within eight years"
Comments
Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.