Wednesday 27 September 2023
Select a region

Toxic waste dumping to continue after planning refusal deferred

Toxic waste dumping to continue after planning refusal deferred

Thursday 13 April 2023

Toxic waste dumping to continue after planning refusal deferred

Thursday 13 April 2023

Asbestos, contaminated soil and other hazardous waste will continue to be dumped at La Collette after a decision to finally refuse planning permission was deferred by six months.

Parts of the construction industry risked grinding to a halt because the Waste Management Site is already exceeding existing permissions with regards to hazardous waste.

The Government had gone to the Planning Committee last month, not only seeking retrospective permission for mounds of waste it had already created over the past 20 years, but also consent to create new piles of waste - and to increase the height of existing ones.

However, the committee refused to approve it – arguing that the group of politicians did not have enough information, the mounds had too much impact on the skyline, and there needed to be a proper Government plan on how waste should be managed in the long-term.

Its refusal, though, was not immediate – when the committee goes against the recommendation of the Planning Department, which they did in this case, the matter returns at its next monthly meeting for ratification.

In delaying this formal step by six months, the committee has given the Government important breathing space.

And even though Infrastructure still does not have planning permission, and it will continue to exceed existing consents, the absence of a formal planning rejection allows it to carry on accepting and dumping toxic waste, it argues.

In parallel to the planning process, Infrastructure Minister Tom Binet employed another tactic to keep the Waste Management Site open – seeking permission from the States Assembly to give his department consent to expand the giant piles of waste.

Tom Binet.jpg

Pictured: Infrastructure Minister Tom Binet: "We will continue our work to prepare short- to medium-term proposals and then a long-term solution that looks much further into the future.”

In response to the Planning Committee’s decision on Thursday to delay its decision, Deputy Binet said: “This is a very welcome decision. All parties have recognised that this is a legacy issue of major strategic importance to the whole community. 

“It is vital that we find an appropriate solution for the disposal of Jersey’s waste, which is a complex and environmentally sensitive problem. 

“This planning application was originally submitted some time ago in 2016 and we need to update it to take account of the changing circumstances and expectations.

“We will continue our work to prepare short- to medium-term proposals and then a long-term solution that looks much further into the future.”

Deputy Binet said that there was a “strong possibility” that he would now withdraw his proposition and return to the Assembly with an updated version.

He added that it was likely the department would now split its planning application into two – a retrospective one seeking to endorse the 30m mound that exists south of the incinerator, and a separate one to increase the height of that mound by another 11 metres, and create new mounds, including a southern headland of hazardous waste and a western headland of non-hazardous inert waste.

Over the last ten years, approximately 250,000 tonnes of hazardous waste have been disposed of at La Collette.

Ash and residues from the Energy-from-Waste plant are exported to the UK; however, other material, including asbestos, contaminated soil, and material from clinical and animal carcass incineration, is buried in lined pits at La Collette which is then covered in soil.


As waste piles up... How much bigger could La Collette grow?

Dealing with growing waste mound “a matter of urgency”

NEWS EYE: Jersey's No Space for Waste Oddity

Sign up to newsletter



Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by john garner on
This a tad harsh ...they did promise to screen the incinerator ..What we didn't realise was screen it with a toxic waste dump
Posted by Martin on
SURELY if a member of the public did this they would be prosecuted?

Nothing compared to the Nuclear waste dumped off Alderney in the 1970,s which is likely leaking into the deep waters! Cancer in Alderney is very high!

Alderney waters ARE very close!

Just google it!
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?