Wednesday 29 November 2023
Select a region

Ministers tell Parker second job “not compatible” with CEO role

Ministers tell Parker second job “not compatible” with CEO role

Tuesday 03 November 2020

Ministers tell Parker second job “not compatible” with CEO role

Tuesday 03 November 2020

Government CEO Charlie Parker will be officially told today that his role as a non-executive director of a real estate firm is “not compatible” with his duties as head of Jersey’s civil service.

This decision of the Council of Ministers means that it has overruled Chief Minister John Le Fondré, who had given a verbal agreement to Mr Parker that he could take up the second three-days-a-year role with NewRiver, a real estate investment trust that buys and manages shopping and leisure centres in the UK.

However, the full conclusion of the Council of Ministers is that this extra role is not compatible with the demands of Mr Parker’s duties as CEO “at this time" - a point emphasised by Senator Le Fondré after he revealed the Council’s objections in the States Assembly yesterday.

The confirmation came in a statement read to the States Assembly by the Chief Minister just one hour after a 'vote of no confidence' was officially lodged against him by Senator Kristina Moore - though she said the motion was about more than just "the New River debacle."

Facing questions on the statement, the Chief Minister reiterated his view that Mr Parker had had a “singular and rare lapse in focus” in failing to seek written permission from the States Employment Board - the official Government employer - after Senator Le Fondré’s verbal approval. 

John Le Fondre Teams.jpeg

Pictured: Chief Minister John Le Fondré addresses the States Assembly via Teams on Monday.

He added that he had also launched an investigation into how established protocols had failed when quotes attributed to him and Deputy Chief Minister Lyndon Farnham - which said that the latter had approved of the appointment when he hadn’t - had been issued by the Government’s Communications Unit without the politicians seeing them or the release.

Asked why he shouldn’t be apologising for not making sure Mr Parker didn’t seek written approval for the extra role, Senator Le Fondré said: “I was entitled to expect a written notification and that didn’t happen. The Chief Executive has apologised to me and the SEB for that, and I have also offered my apologies to the SEB.”

The Chief Minister was also asked what would happen if Mr Parker refused to give up his second role. However, he replied that he could not comment on individual employment matters. 

He also rejected an accusation from Deputy Russell Labey that the CEO had been taken on by New River not because of what he would do, but who he was.


Pictured: The Chief Minister is investigating how the Government's Communications Unit sent out a statement without his or the Deputy Chief Minister's approval.

The Deputy said: “If a CEO is being paid £50,000 for three days’ work, it is clearly not the hours that the company is after but the name. And that name is ‘CEO of the Jersey civil service’, which should not be for sale.” 

But the Chief Minister denied this was the case: “The Chief Executive is not paid any money,” he said. “It goes into a salary sacrifice scheme and he will not see the funds. 

“Secondly, my understanding is that this is an area of expertise. He was approached by a headhunter who was looking for his expertise in these areas, as he has done regeneration schemes in UK cities in the past. 

“It has been made clear to me that the issue of conflict of interests was at the forefront of the Chief Executive's mind from day one. The business has no operational structures here in Jersey. 

“However, the SEB has been clear: they want more due diligence done, which is why we are verifying the no conflict of interests and the salary sacrifice scheme.”

The Chief Minister’s statement in full...

“There has been much public and political speculation and discussion about the correctness of the Chief Executive of the Government, Charlie Parker, accepting the role as a Non-Executive Director of New River, a UK real estate company.

“I wish to briefly set out some of the events that have taken place, to bring Members up to date, and, in making this statement, to allow Members to ask further questions.

“Much of this speculation is taking place without the necessary clarity on all of the facts, and with a misunderstanding about the role of a NED, the time commitment it would require, and the steps that the Chief Executive took to ensure that there was no real, or perceived, conflict of interest between his appointment and position as head of the Island’s public sector.

”The Chief Executive has accepted that there were errors, made by him, in seeking agreement to the appointment. He has met with the States Employment Board (SEB) and has offered them his sincere apologies for his oversight. He has also apologised to me.

”I have also apologised to the SEB and we have agreed that the shortcomings that led to this situation will be corrected immediately. I also recognise the anger that has arisen among Members, Ministers and the public.

“The Council of Ministers has been briefed on this position recognising the heightened level of concern about this appointment. The Council has agreed that I should meet with the Chief Executive at the earliest opportunity to relay their concerns and allow the Chief Executive to respond to them.

“Whilst the Council of Ministers expressed their support for the Chief Executive in the role he is doing, they have felt that the Non-Executive role is not compatible with the demands of his duties at this time. I am expecting to have further clarity for the Council of Ministers and SEB tomorrow.

“I completely believe that management of conflicts of interest, actual or perceived, should be of paramount importance to the Government and this Assembly.

”And I also believe that there should be no circumstances at all where an officer, Minister or Member of the Assembly are in a situation where they are benefiting from a position that puts them in direct conflict with their responsibilities to the public.

“As a result of the concerns that this matter has thrown into sharp contrast, I have asked that a process be commenced to instigate a Government-wide review of the way we identify, manage and resolve these types of issues, including related-party transactions.

“I agree with the Chair of Scrutiny and the other Members and Ministers who have said publicly that we must set an example in terms of transparency and accountability, and that nothing less should be expected of our public sector leadership.

”I will therefore be inviting the Chair of the Privileges and Procedures Committee to join me in this work, focusing on the declaration of interests of Members, related-party transactions and any other such issues as Politically Exposed Persons, to ensure we do apply the same standards across the board for elected members, Ministers and public officials, and to determine whether any processes need to be strengthened.

“I am proposing that this review, and subsequent guidance, be founded on key principles of best practice on managing conflict of interest in the public service; which includes serving the public interest, supporting transparency and scrutiny, and promoting individual responsibility and personal example.

”I undertake to return to the Assembly to provide an update on this work and the steps that we will be taking, as a Government, to implement the measures.
Sir - Ministers, the Chief Executive and officials have been working throughout the weekend, and indeed in the last few weekends and weeks, on critical Brexit-related matters integral to our future economy, yesterday we responded to the planned lockdown in England, and this morning we announced our COVID-19 winter strategy. These are all matters that have a tangible impact on Islanders lives.

“Members will recall that at the start of the pandemic I said that we would all need to work together to navigate the challenges we are facing. With this in mind, I am disappointed that some Members chose to make public statements on the issue regarding the Chief Executive without approaching me directly to understand the facts.

“However, I would, like to recognise and thank the newly appointed Chair of PAC who has issued her own balanced statement expressing her wish to understand the matter in detail.

“I believe some Members would like to capitalise on this opportunity for political gain and to see the Chief Executive, myself, or the Government fall. I believe that this type of behaviour would result in a manifestly disproportionate outcome given the circumstances.

It is for Members to consider if they really feel that such a move is in the interests of the Island. It is for Members to consider if they want to initiate a situation where the proposed Government Plan, and the planned funding arrangements for schools, for healthcare, for investing in our economy and for managing the COVID-19 pandemic are all put at risk.

“It is for Members to consider if they want to focus on removing a Chief Executive at a time when we instead should be focusing on improving children’s services, delivering changes to health care and mental health services, building a new hospital, delivering a revamped Fort Regent and key public service reforms, sorting out the huge number of legacy issues facing our technology systems, and of course improving our estate.

“And it is for Members to consider how the public will view such unnecessary and all- encompassing politicised disruption to the work of Government, in the middle of a severe pandemic on our borders and preparations for the new UK-EU relationship.

”This is a challenging time, but we are dealing successfully with the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in a way that has allowed us to avoid significant Island-wide restrictions.

“Members will recall the briefing on legacy challenges facing the Government that I set out last year. A Deputy of this Assembly said it was the best and most honest briefing he had ever received. We are still focused on addressing those issues whilst managing the pandemic and preparing the Government Plan for the next four years.

We have a new healthcare model which we are debating this week, and a plan for the new Hospital, which this Assembly will debate this month. On 17 November we will debate the establishment of the fiscal stimulus fund. And, in December we will be debating both the proposed Migration Control Policy and the Government Plan.

“The Chief Executive has been integral to all of these projects and many more, and has provided leadership and direction to the officials tasked with taking them to fruition.

”He works tirelessly, and is always available to Ministers whenever called upon, at any time of the day or night. I have never questioned his commitment to the Island or his integrity. And I do not believe that this matter should continue to distract us, or him, from continuing the critical work of Government that needs all our focus.

“I have outlined the thoughts and processes that have gone into managing this matter. As I have said, the Council of Ministers have asked me to meet with the Chief Executive to relay their concerns and allow the Chief Executive to respond to them.

“I expect to be in a position to update them and SEB tomorrow.”

Sign up to newsletter



Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by Jon Needham on
The acceptance of any NED appointment requires considerable thought not just to consider the conflicts of interest that may arise but also understand the considerable personal liability that such appointments incur. In considering these points it is simply not credible to believe the rules and policy governing such appointments were overlooked as a result of a « rare lapse of focus » given the level of personal reflection such things demand.
Posted by Kathryn Robinson on
Rare lapse of focus sounds like he accidentally bought strawberry jam instead of raspberry- what a poorly thought out way to describe this. John Le Fondre time to stop digging yourself into a deeper hole.
Posted by Keith Marsh on
The Chief Minister makes a strong case for not requesting change, in his or the Chief Executive positions.
But with such a blatant disregard for normal practice and the lateness of the reversal of Mr Parker's £ 50,000 extra income, which was his then days later became a charity donation, can we continue to have TRUST in such words.
Then there is the situation concerning the poor response of Jerseys Civil Service and the lowering standards of service ~ all happening under Mr. Parker's control.
Posted by Paul Troalic on
Hold on, this guy is the CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE CIVIL SERVICE and the CM is saying it was a rare lapse. Whaaat!
Is he saying that the head of the civil service is allowed rare lapses of concentration and be able to get away with it. I don't think so! This is totally unacceptable.
And as for the CM saying that "I was entitled to expect a written notification and that didn’t happen". Come on we are not stupid and neither is he!
Nothing less than Charlie Parker resigning his post will be acceptable.
Clearly he cannot be trusted and he has to do the right thing. Please go and peddle your wares elsewhere as we don't want you Mr Parker.
Posted by George Baird on
Well , Well , Well. It’s taken the best part of a week for the Chief Minister to be told by his Council of Ministers that Mr Parker should resign from his NED position. Common sense has prevailed but serious questions have to be asked. Why did Mr Parker even accept the appointment in the first place when he and his team and the Island of Jersey were slap bang in the middle of a pandemic with Brexit on the horizon. A poor show all round.
Posted by Jon Jon on
You could write a comedy skit on this...This story changes by the hour,it needs an Eastender Music Ending.
Posted by IanSmith97 on
2 emails to query my income tax, 3.5 months later, no reply. I can’t even call in in person to discuss. Deplorable service, never was like that pre Parker and his management-speak bumper fun book reforms.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?