Friday 02 December 2022
Select a region
News

New property tax could mean extra £1m a year for affordable homes

New property tax could mean extra £1m a year for affordable homes

Wednesday 29 December 2021

New property tax could mean extra £1m a year for affordable homes

Wednesday 29 December 2021


New taxes on certain types of property transactions could raise up to £1m a year to be put towards creating more social housing and affordable homes, if politicians agree.

Treasury Minister Deputy Susie Pinel wants to create an ‘Enveloped Property Transactions Tax’ (EPTT) applying to purchases involving land or property owned by a company.

The tax will apply where the land has a market value exceeding £700,000 for commercial property and £500,000 for residential – thresholds put in place to “mitigate any adverse impact… on lower-value properties, including those in the retail and hospitality industries.”

Currently, only certain transactions involving properties or land owned by a company rather than an individual will incur Stamp Duty or Land Transaction Tax.

Where commercial real estate is held within a company, and the ownership of the company changes hands by way of share transfer, there is no charge.

If the Treasury Minister’s proposal succeeds, this would change that, ensuring all share transfer transactions receive “broadly equivalent treatment.”

susan-pinel.jpg

Pictured: Treasury Minister Deputy Susie Pinel.

It would also mean up to £1m extra in revenue being generated each year – money the Minister is pledging to earmark for the Housing Development Fund, which provides loans to Andium Homes and other social housing providers. 

The intention to rectify "the issue of the sale of Jersey real estate owned within a corporate structure by way of transfer of shares which crystallises neither a stamp duty charge nor a land transaction tax liability" was first outlined in former Treasury Minister Alan Maclean's 2018 Budget Statement.

A consultation was then held between 22 July and 14 October 2019 to get the public’s views on the proposals. Numerous discussions about the policy and the technical detail with key stakeholders have been taking place since April this year, including two round table events.

In a report explaining her proposals, Deputy Pinel explained that the consultation “examined the position of residential and commercial property held within a company” and found that “transactions of this nature are more common with commercial property than with residential property due to Jersey’s housing restrictions on residential property.” 

The draft law put forward by the Minister also allows for surcharges to be levied in the event of late payment of the tax and for penalties to be applied for failure to provide information or to otherwise provide incorrect information.

During the Government Plan debate earlier this month, the Chief Minister indicated that he would be moving to ban new share transfer residential units from being created and sold to an individual.

Express understands that he was originally due to sign an order to facilitate the change before Christmas. However, an official Ministerial Decision to update policy under the existing Control of Housing and Work Law is yet to emerge. 

Deputy Pinel’s EPTT proposals are due to come before the States Assembly for debate in February 2022.

Sign up to newsletter

 

Comments

Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by Bruce Willing on
I see nothing to celebrate over the possibility of “£1 million” being added to the social housing budget as a result of a new tax. It is a gesture only. £1 million is scratching the surface of this issue and would probably add between three and five units to the housing stock, depending whether or not the States owned the land.. This is a crisis, not simply an issue. We urgently need more social housing and government needs to prioritise this, now.
Posted by Davey West on
Andium takes millions in rent, and the Government helps itself to around £28 million of this each and every year, ( States Accounts ) which goes straight to the treasury. If they did not, then Andium would not have to borrow hundreds of millions to build social housing. It could be argued that the Jersey Government is going around the houses trying to stay out of sight with it's borrowing, its not us it's Andium ? Whats this silly make an extra million for affordable homes excuse ? Just take less from Andium, now that would be reasonable.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?