Saturday 20 April 2024
Select a region
News

Nightingale touted as mass testing solution

Nightingale touted as mass testing solution

Tuesday 23 June 2020

Nightingale touted as mass testing solution

Tuesday 23 June 2020


Jersey’s unused Nightingale Hospital has been touted as an ideal location for a mass covid-19 testing facility as part of a wider bid to revive tourism.

The idea was put forward by Tim Crowley, who sits as a Non-Executive Director on the board of Visit Jersey, in a recent meeting of island’s most senior hospitality figures and government representatives about how to get the strained industry back on its feet.

A testing regime pilot for new arrivals is currently underway, with those arriving off lifeline routes offered a PCR (diagnostic test) test as an alternative to 14-day quarantine if they have a negative result. 

But officials have explained that scaling up this facility if the island is opened up to non-essential travel and tourists in line with calls from the hospitality industry carries significant challenges. 

nightingalebeds.jpg

Pictured: Inside the Nightingale facility.

Speaking to the Tourism Recovery Task Force Steering Committee, Economic Development Minister Senator Lyndon Farnham confirmed that options around moving testing outside of the airport were being discussed, noting that a dedicated testing centre may be more efficient. 

While hotelier David Seymour of Seymour Hotels suggested running a track and testing programme through hotels, keeping people within an area until their results come through, Visit Jersey’s Tim Crowley, who is also the Managing Director of La Mare Wine Estate, put forward the Millbrook Park-based Nightingale Hospital as a testing solution. 

Express has asked the government for a list of the sites being considered to provide a dedicated testing facility, and whether the Nightingale Hospital is under consideration, and is awaiting a response.

The 180-bed temporary wing of Jersey’s hospital was hastily constructed amid fears of a spike in covid-19 cases in Jersey.

populationeconomypeople.jpg

Pictured: Hospitality heads think a better testing regime could be key to unlocking tourism and its benefit to the economy.

However, with case numbers now under control – at the time of writing, just five asymptomatic islanders are recorded as having the illness – critics have now suggested the empty premises is becoming an expensive ‘white elephant’. 

When its construction was first announced, officials said they estimated the build would be in place for a period of 16 weeks.  

But the contract for use of the land struck with the landowners – all of whom are descendants of Boots businesswoman and philanthropist Florence Boot, who wanted the land to be used for public benefit – is valid for a period of 12 months. 

Released under the Freedom of Information Law, a version of the agreement with all financial details redacted shows a “Commencement Date” of 9 April 2020, meaning that the government will be able to keep using the land until April 2021 if deemed necessary.

-20200415nightingale004.jpg

Pictured: The field hospital when it was under construction.

However, the agreement specifically relates to using the coastal-facing field as a ‘Surge Medical Facility’.

If the government decides to transform the Millbrook site into a test facility, it will have to seek fresh approval.

In the case that the Nightingale is decommissioned, the Health Department has vowed to reuse any clinical and non-clinical equipment removed from the facility, according to a response to a separate FOI request.

Those supplies will be either used as part of its equipment replacement programme or will be stored as contingency stock for future pandemics or other major incidents.

Sign up to newsletter

 

Comments

Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?