Select a region
Skilled workers risk being stranded abroad because of the Government's reluctance to introduce more recognisable visas, according to a Scrutiny panel.
Currently, skilled workers on visas receive a ‘wet ink’ Jersey immigration stamp in their passport, but some people have struggled to get back to the island after their airlines did not recognise this stamp.
The Children, Education and Home Affairs Scrutiny Panel has suggested that Jersey produces 'visa vignettes' – physical visas that are added to a traveller’s passport or travel document – which would be more recognisable to airlines and are already in use in the UK.
However, during a Scrutiny hearing this week, Home Affairs Minister Helen Miles said that producing vignettes would be "prohibitively expensive" and that the difficulties experienced at airports had only affected a "very small number" of people.
Pictured: Home Affairs Minister Helen Miles said the issue only affected a "very small number" of people.
She added that she would instead focus on communicating with airlines about the use of the Jersey immigration stamp and consult with the UK Common Travel Area policy team.
Deputy Catherine Curtis, Chair of the Children, Education and Home Affairs Scrutiny Panel, said: "Whilst we understand that the issue with Jersey’s 'wet ink' immigration stamps not being recognised is only impacting a small minority of people, the panel feels that it is of high importance that those skilled individuals returning to Jersey are not left stranded due to airlines not recognising their official stamps as valid.
Pictured: Deputy Catherine Curtis chairs the Children, Education and Home Affairs Scrutiny Panel.
"We feel that the work being done to share information with relevant airports about these stamps may not be enough to ensure that all passengers in this situation will be permitted to travel, and we will be following up this issue to examine exactly what the associated costs would be with implementing [visa] vignettes."
Comments
Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.