Sunday 26 June 2022
Select a region

We have a Foreshore map…but you can’t see it

We have a Foreshore map…but you can’t see it

Monday 21 September 2020

We have a Foreshore map…but you can’t see it

Monday 21 September 2020

The Government has drafted a masterplan detailing where it believes the foreshore is, and the hundreds of coastal properties lying on the disputed land – but is refusing to release it.

Jersey Property Holdings (JPH) is soon to start contacting all islanders with property ‘encroaching’ on the area – defined as being between the historic high and low tide mark – in order to “discuss their boundary situation."

But, ahead of that, they are declining to share the map they’ll be using – meaning that islanders won’t know if their properties sit on the controversial chunk of land until they are contacted. 

The revelation came in the proposed new Foreshore Policy, which was published very late on Friday by the Infrastructure Minister and is due to be debated in States Assembly in November.

As Express revealed last week, the new policy suggests a ‘sliding scale’ of retrospective charges for those that have bought property on, or built on, the ill-defined land. Those charges vary according to the severity of encroachment and the length it has been there.


Pictured: More than 400 properties are believed to sit on the Foreshore.

The document acknowledges that, at the time the Foreshore was passed from the Crown into Jersey ownership, there was no complete map of the Foreshore.

Since then, however, it said that a project had been undertaken to find the landside boundary of the Foreshore involving extensive site inspections and the production of individual reports on sections of coastline around the island.

That work also involved identifying cases of adjoining coastal properties that have extended over that line or where properties have built up to or onto seawalls – the number of which is believed to be more than 400, a source told Express.

While analysis is still taking place, a ‘Master Schedule’ has been created providing a “summary of the key findings”.

Once complete, it is intended that it will be a “live document” that will be updated “upon each encroachment case being resolved and the new length of boundary line being set.”

The report says that document will be exempt for two reasons: “it is derived from privileged and confidential legal advice provided by the Law Officers’ Department” and that “it contains information which is effectively private to individual property owners, and it would be inappropriate to openly publish that.”

However, the report adds: “However, it is JPH’s intention to plan to start contacting individual property owners on a planned basis to discuss their boundary situation, and this will be as the department’s resources permit. And should any owner whose property adjoins the Foreshore wish to contact the department to discuss their boundary at that specific location, they are free to do so on providing proof of identity/ownership.”

It continues: “As mentioned above, having considered the nature and extent of the Foreshore encroachments as gleaned from the research carried out, JPH is minded to advise and recommend “default boundary line positions” as set-out on the Master Schedule. 

“The “default boundary line positions” are the markers at which JPH will recommend that boundaries are ratified with adjoining property owners, subject to: 

  • Any encroachments which may exist up to, on, or over the 'default boundary line positions' being agreed on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the Policy; 
  • The agreement of contract terms, including possible access rights behind seawalls for essential repair, reconstruction or heightening; 
  • The “default boundary line positions” being deemed to be subject to established conveyancing principles in respect of matters such as 'offset' and customary set-back for openings etc; 
  • The approval of the contract terms by the Minister for Infrastructure under Standing Order 168 and notification of decision to the States; 
  • The 'default boundary line positions' not being applicable to cases where contractual boundaries have already been agreed with the Crown prior to June 2015 or the Public post June 2015.”

The publication of the policy comes just days ahead of a crucial vote in the States Assembly in which Deputy Carolyn Labey will ask for the Government to cease and desist with its Foreshore compensation regime.


Pictured: Deputy Carolyn Labey, who is fighting to put an end to the Foreshore controversy.

The former Minister who brokered the Foreshore deal with the Crown, Sir Philip Bailhache, has spoken out against the Government's tactics, saying that they do not match the spirit of the Queen's gift.

Pictured top: The 'Foreshore' is vaguely defined as the land between the high and low tide marks - but historic images show how difficult that is to define at present.

Sign up to newsletter



Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by AlanLuce59 on
It interesting how the public have paid for the foreshore boundary line to be determined, yet make it unavailable.

The public “through JPH” are the injured party, if people have encroached it is the taking of the public’s land. Therefore will be party to any agreement or otherwise.

It cannot therefore be not in the public interest to not disclose the map.

My data rights were breached as JPH wrote to Broadlands. The very thing they now say is inappropriate.

Indeed as all contracts are passed before the Royal Court and the deeds held for public scrutiny what are they protecting.

I can do a deed search at the register for title over say “el Tico” which I am entitled to see. Lawyers do this as a matter of course unencumbered by secrecy.

The only motive again in not disclosing will be to shield prying eyes over who has been the biggest encroacher of all.... The People of Jersey by way of government or quangos.

Not at all transparent or demonstrate a worthwhile process.

We know ( basically) who you are and when we are ready (and most likely) when you are not bushwhack and bully to get our money.

Incredible really. Heads must roll.
Posted by L Brindle on
Surely, the foreshore area includes the Castle Quay development, the Horizon development, the newly built finance centres, the Radisson and who knows what else. People aren't stupid, about time the government in general and the quango known as JPH acknowledged this. They're the ones who look ridiculous. We have a map, but you can't see it. Really? Pathetic and childish.
Posted by David Rotherham on
As foreshores include shifting sands, they are dynamic features, not specified places. Any map that is not completely resurveyed after each spring tide will be utterly useless. The old definition of strand line to as deep as a horse can wade is far better, as it describes where the foreshore is on the day.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?