Tuesday 28 March 2023
Select a region
News

“Foolhardy” to claim new hospital plan will be cheaper than old one, says Minister

“Foolhardy” to claim new hospital plan will be cheaper than old one, says Minister

Monday 30 January 2023

“Foolhardy” to claim new hospital plan will be cheaper than old one, says Minister

Monday 30 January 2023


It would be “foolhardy” to give a definitive guarantee that the new multi-site plan for upgrading the island’s health facilities will cost less overall than the previous £800m Overdale project, according to the Treasury Minister.

Deputy Ian Gorst made the comment at a Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel hearing on Friday, after he was pressed by Deputy Lyndon Farnham assurances over the cost of the new scheme, which will be delivered in phases, in comparison to the previous government's 'Our Hospital' vision.

'Our Hospital' was officially thrown out by the government following a £30,000 review led by Infrastructure Minister Tom Binet and 'Expert Adviser' Alan Moore, who concluded that creating new health facilities "over two or more sites" - primarily at Overdale and Gloucester Street/Kensington Place, where work on homes was halted in anticipation over summer - would provide the "best opportunity to make the scheme more affordable and appropriate”.

kensingtonplace.jpg

Pictured: Ministers halted Andium's work to build homes at Kensington Place in case the land was needed for future hospital expansion last summer.

However, Deputy Lyndon Farnham - who was previously the Minister in charge of the project - has repeatedly challenged the findings of the review.

Rejecting suggestions that the decision to scrap the scheme was political, Deputy Gorst said in response to Deputy Farnham's questioning on Friday: "The decision to not go ahead with the contract and the design and delivery partner was... entirely premised on the fact that the economic circumstances had changed and that that contract [for] that hospital could not be built for £804 million.

"It was £920m at the best with a fair wind and no change in interest rates.

"We know that even during the course of what would have been a more prolonged negotiation – that's providing the relationship actually stood up and one wanted to continue with that ... partner – it couldn't be delivered."

Deputy Gorst was also pressed by the panel's Chair, Deputy Sam Mézec, about whether there had ever been a serious political conversation around the Council of Ministers' table about reverting to the States Assembly to ask for a new spending limit to proceed with the Overdale development.

"Or were the discussions... predicated on an assumption that you weren't going to consider that option seriously?" Deputy Mézec asked.

"They were predicated on an assumption which was... that there should be, because of economic circumstances, a review of the current scheme. That's my position. I have been clear about that. That's why I supported the review being undertaken," Deputy Gorst responded.

Following the hearing, Deputy Mézec commented: "We thank the Minister and his Officers for their responses to our questions. We will continue to closely scrutinise the major capital expenditure that is Hospital financing."

Sign up to newsletter

 

Comments

Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by IanSmith97 on
And so the insanity continues. This lot couldn’t run a bath. The Overdale opponents ALWAYS said and harped on that the Overdale cost was its Achilles heel and they could build an all singing and dancing hospital for less than £800 million. Quell surprise, they can’t. An utter, utter shambles, shameful, the whole fiasco. An embarrassment.
Posted by Ann Robbie on
I, like many people I know, have got to the stage where I don’t care what it costs or where you build it just DO IT
Posted by Michael Van Neste on
What it costs is totally relevant and important. If we can't afford it, we would be mad and wholly irresponsible to try to build it. That is just common sense. If we end up with a less than perfect solution, that's life. Make the best of it.
Posted by Jon Jon on
Got to the point now where I see this Island is run by nutters,prob why I couldn't be bothered to vote last year.Forget the hospital ,I don't see it being built in the next generation of people.
Posted by Keith Marsh on
Typical. The Chief Minister and the puppet she made to complete a report when she knew Overdale would not be considered. That was her and the reviewer's position, before the election ~ hence the cancellation of One Site Overdale was a POLITICAL one and nothing to do with money or common sense.
Now we hear the truth, the multi hospital system will cost more ~ and that is before anyone actually gets a back of an envelope and scribbles a few numbers.
Jersey heads BACKWARDS, yet again.
Posted by David Ng on
Healthcare is a political football and the score is 1-1 and Moore, Gorst, Binet have the ball. I hope they are satisfied delaying the build of the island's most important building. It shouldn't be a "half baked" plan with "make-do" buildings, scattered around the island, which won't be future-proofed, and can't be staffed safely without significant changes to recruitment and retention incentives for healthcare workers. And it seems it will cost more although it will "phased". The longer the delay the more lives will be affected. It is not all about cost which is what they seem to talk about, it's about people and patients, and our future healthcare. Just get on with it
Posted by IanSmith97 on
And so the insanity continues. This lot couldn’t run a bath. The Overdale opponents ALWAYS said and harped on that the Overdale cost was its Achilles heel and they could build an all singing and dancing hospital for less than £800 million. Quell surprise, they can’t. An utter, utter shambles, shameful, the whole fiasco. An embarrassment.
Posted by Peter Huntingdon Bewers on
I think a New Hospital could be built, and at a reasonable Cost if the States got down to it properly, First of all, there is the question of a sensible site. many good ones were put forward by the People of Jersey , but they were not considered. Bel Royal opposite the Glass Church would have been ideal , but the St Lawrence Constable came under such pressure from her Parishoners it was killed off inside 48 Hours ? Also St Saviours , which is owned by the People of Jersey was never even considered. plus the past Constable of St John did a Trip to France with several States Members to see a Hospital Builder who said they would be pleased to come to Jersey and Build us A Hospital for around £250,000 plus on our own site. but we never heard of any follow-through. The Billion Pound Hospital is not affordable and could almost bankrupt the Island.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?