Thursday 19 May 2022
Select a region

Housing: lack of action blamed on “political cowardice”

Housing: lack of action blamed on “political cowardice”

Monday 07 June 2021

Housing: lack of action blamed on “political cowardice”

Monday 07 June 2021

The Government has been criticised for failing to address the housing crisis with the latest report from the Minister slammed for repeating work that has already been done.

Deputy Russell Labey published his 'Creating Better Homes' report, which was described as a ‘housing action plan’, on Friday.

It comes just a few weeks after the publication of the Housing Policy Development Board report which made 12 recommendations on how to address the housing crisis. This included suggestions as the use of compulsory purchase powers to create new sites for development, the conversion of large homes into multiple units, an ‘Affordable Housing Contribution’ for new developments, better security for tenants rights and rent stabilisation as well as a revised social rent policy.


Pictured: The Housing Minister said work was underway for policies and incentives aiming to encourage 'right-sizing'.

The board also recommended a Government-funded “personal support and advice service for ‘right-sizers’ which is mentioned in the Minister’s report as discussions already appear to be underway on the matter.

But both the former Housing Minister, Senator Sam Mézec, and Stuart Langhorn from the Jersey Tenants' Forum have voiced their disappointment at the lack of “tangible action” being taken to address the housing crisis.

“It’s a major disappointment, they are not coming forward with any proposals,” Mr Langhorn said.

“The Minister has been talking about the overheating of the market for months now, but he has not taken any action. It’s all very well talking about it but there needs to be action. Whilst talk is easy, bringing forward legislation needs to happen now.

“The Minister has just come forward with a plan that says we are going to have a conversation about it. They already have the answers about what to do, but the answers were particularly uncomfortable because they do not suit a particular sector.”


Pictured: “The Minister has been talking about the overheating of the market for months now, but he has not taken any action," Mr Langhorn said.

Mr Langhorn explained that one of the major concerns for tenants in the island is the increase of rental prices and that a rent tribunal, which already exists in other jurisdictions to look into “unreasonable” rent rises, would be a “quick win” in the island.

“People are already facing 20% rent increases now, what’s happening is that people are being priced out of the island,” he said. “The Government does not have a plan to deal with that. It does not look at the bigger picture, they do not have a long-term plan and they are not prepared to take any action now.

“They need to make a decision about what the island is going to look like in 10 years? You will have a lot of very wealthy people who own a lot of homes, but most people will not be able to buy, and I am talking about anyone with an income below £75,000, that’s the direction the island is going in.

“They either have to pay people more and therefore need to tax more, or they need to build accommodation and pay people to be in it. At the moment there’s nothing. Rich people can buy houses and rent them to poor people at whatever cost they want, this is not sustainable now and this isn’t going to be sustainable in 10 years.”

He also voiced his dismay at the fact that proposals for a landlord licensing scheme, which were due to be debated on 8 June, were delayed to 20 July, saying there is no reason for them to be delayed when their goal is to ensure the safety of the tenants.


Pictured: Mr Langhorn says the Government is not prepared any action in the housing crisis now.

A Government spokesperson confirmed that the debate on the proposals had been deferred so that the Environment Minister, Deputy John Young, could consider the comments from the Environment, Housing and Infrastructure Scrutiny Panel, which were released on 2 June.

With the Government already aware of the solutions to the crisis, Mr Langhorn believes the lack of action is linked to the impending election with politicians preferring to “kick it into touch for another four years."

“Meanwhile people are leaving, and we have a big problem,” he said. “Every report comes back and says you have to deal with it. Clearly the Policy Development Board came out with solutions but maybe they were not comfortable. Something radical needs to be done because at the moment the system works for the minority, not the majority.

“You need to take tough decisions that is why you are elected, setting up a talking shop is not making a political decision, it’s not taking tough decisions.”

Senator Mézec said the Minister’s report was “particularly disappointing” given the HPDB had proposed “very clear and tangible actions”. He said the majority of the actions recommended consisted of proposals for “more talking, research and engaging consultants, rather than clear commitments to change laws or affect tangible policy changes”.

“Here we are eight months later, and they have still not confirmed whether they accept the recommendations,” he said.

“It was two years, hundreds of thousands of pounds and the Government want to waste more money doing the same work again, which is just a complete waste of time.”

He also noted how the Housing Minister’s report proposed to build 1,000 affordable homes by 2025, 500 less than what is set out in the Bridging Island Plan. “They are not paying attention,” he said.


Pictured: "They would be as cowardly after the election," Senator Mézec said.

“In Government, there are people who actually do not want to undertake any decision at all,” he added. “They know how big an issue housing is but they are simply unwilling to take action because it just goes against their belief to make interventions into a market.

"They believe that if you build more homes, it will magically fix the problem. They simply do not have the skills to understand how things work and they were so confused by the report that they would rather leave it on a shelf.”

Earlier this year, the former Housing Minister released proposals to declare an official ‘housing crisis’ in Jersey and force the Government to make all tenancies open-ended, ban rent increases above the inflation rate, cut social housing rents to 80% of the market rate and set up a Rent Tribunal, based on the recommendations from the HPDB.

States Assembly.jpeg

Pictured: The Minister's report came just days before the debate on Senator Mézec's proposals.

He believes that the timing of Deputy Labey’s publication, which came just days ahead of the debate schedule for tomorrow (8 June), was deliberate to “take wind out of his sails” and “kick the issue in the long grass again”.

“I was made to delay my proposal to give more time to the Minister to consider it,” he explained. “It feels like I have been stabbed in the back and misled into doing that when the Minister was working against me and not with me.

“He was doing it to destroy my chances with my proposal and confuse the matter further. I think my job is much harder now that a spanner has been thrown in the works.

“My job is much more difficult because this gives the Government a get-out clause and the opportunity to hide away and pretend they are doing something whilst not doing anything.”

For Senator Mézec, the only way out of the housing crisis is for islanders to come out and vote for people who “commit to real changes” in next year’s election.

“Take out those who do not have the courage of their convictions, who bend over whenever an investor is talking, and are clearly on the wrong side,” he said. “The only way you get action is by electing people who have a clear plan.

“I hope people will realise they are being ripped off by a Government that is outsourcing all their decisions and will instead elect people who have a clear housing plan in their manifesto.”

Sign up to newsletter



Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by Dave Mathews on
I cannot imagine House prices going up anymore following the G7 decision to change our Tax system. We've never faced so much economic uncertainty before.
Posted by Guy de Faye on
Residential accommodation problems are the direct result of Jersey's overpopulation crisis. The Island is now at least 20,000 residents beyond the calculated "sustainable population level" detailed in the 1990s.
The real cowardice in government is clinging to a catastrophic economic growth policy based on increasing the tax base via immigration, recently running at 1,400 new residents per year.

Local "social housing" is, additionally, a catalogue of misguided policies. 

Why are our less well off being charged Andium rentals at 90% of the market rate? 

Their properties are owned by the public of Jersey and are NOT part of the property market.
Plus, a significant amount of those rents are used to pay off Andium loans and provide core funding for new housing - which is a burden that should not be imposed on local people who can least afford to pay for borrowings and building construction.

Senator Mezec's proposal to reduce rent charges to 80% of market rate entirely misses the point.

Andium tenants should be charged a fair rent based around the cost of administering and maintaining the current Andium Housing portfolio - linked to individual accommodation allocation, allowing rents to be cut immediately by roughly a half (simultaneously reducing the payouts coming from Social Security). 
His other suggestions fly in the face of basic supply and demand economics and the specific effects of the limitations of a small island - they are an exercise in public relations that will achieve little.

If Jersey wishes to increase the level of social housing then the funding should be provided by the Government of Jersey as an additional capital expenditure. Housing the less well off is a responsibility of the government, NOT an opportunity to penalise Andium tenants.

Posted by James Neal on
There is more than a housing crisis, it's a complete meltdown. There is no where to rent. Even if you can afford high rents. So many people are leaving, yet there are so many empty properties in Jersey. Government need to be held to account for this, it's unforgivable. Old people are being tossed out of their homes with no where to go.
Posted by Scott Mills on
Hope there's a boat in the morning, because over the next 10 years, more and more will be using it, for cheaper......Everything!!! Still least our lovely beaches are free
Posted by Martin on
That is a good idea!

Charge for the beaches!

Once people have got used to that then charge for air?
Posted by Private Individual on
Once again it is not rocket science, stop the increase in population and you stop the need for excessive housing demand.

There is no happy ending to any of this, the government is solely to blame for its lack of control and mismanagement of our borders and economy.

Senator Mezec did nothing to stop any of the present predicaments and instead insisted more immigration was not a problem, he along with the council of ministers are the architects of the misery thousands of taxpayers now face.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?