Monday 18 October 2021
Select a region
News

Discussions before £1.65m field sale to be made public

Discussions before £1.65m field sale to be made public

Wednesday 09 June 2021

Discussions before £1.65m field sale to be made public


Discussions about the fate of a field that was bought at an inflated price before it was proposed for rezoning as a quarry extension will be made public, the Environment Minister has said.

Field ‘MY966’ was sold to La Gigoulande quarry owner Granite Products at the end of 2019 for £1.65m, a figure greatly above the market value for its permitted use, agriculture.

However, this field was later earmarked as suitable for the aggregate quarry in St. Peter’s Valley to expand into, leading some to ask if the earlier purchase was “a done deal”.

Already denying this was the case, Environment Minister Deputy John Young has committed to publish any correspondence between Granite Products and consultants Arup, which wrote a strategy on future mineral extraction, recommending that the quarry expand into the field.

Arup’s conclusions were incorporated into the recently published draft short-term Island Plan, which is a blueprint for planning policy from next year until the end of 2025.

La Gigoulande.jpeg

Pictured: The draft bridging Island Plan recommends that La Gigoulande quarry in St Peter’s Valley is allowed to expand into a nearby field.

Since its publication, a number of residents living close to the field have strongly objected to the quarry’s expansion

Answering a question from St. Lawrence Deputy Kirsten Morel in the States Assembly on Tuesday, Deputy Young said it was normal for people wanting to buy land to ask Planning officers about its future use.

“But that advice is always given without commitment because the decision, certainly in this case, will ultimately be made by the States Assembly,” he said.

“The Arup report sets out the conflicting arguments around where the Island sources its minerals in future. After a period of consultation, the independent inspector reviewing the Island Plan will look into Arup’s recommendations and if the evidence doesn’t stack up, then it won’t happen.”

“If one reads their report, it shows there were consultation between Arup and representatives of Granite Products in February 2020 followed by written representations to their questions. I haven’t seen those letters, but I have asked them to be produced.

“My role is to ensure the planning process is open and transparent.”

Jersey Water had previously said that La Gigoulande Quarry would be a suitable site for a reservoir but this is not supported in the latest Island Plan.

CEO Helier Smith told Express yesterday that, while Jersey Water were “disappointed” they were not able to use the site for a reservoir, they were "moving on and working on our Water Resources Management plan [and] looking at other resolutions and sites in the island."

Granite Products has previously said that it bought the field 18 months ago so that "it had the opportunity to continue to meet Jersey’s needs for construction materials for many years to come.”

It added that “any proposal would be rightly scrutinised as part of the planning process, which will include consultation with local residents and the public."

LISTEN...

Express explored the controversy surrounding La Gigoulande's future in its recent podcast, 'A very 'quarry' story?'.

Subscribe to Bailiwick Podcasts on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Deezer or Whooshkaa.

Sign up to newsletter

 

Comments

Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by john garner on
How much is an agricultural 29 vergee field then ?
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?