Wednesday 17 August 2022
Select a region
News

Ministers say Waterfront must go ahead despite protests

Ministers say Waterfront must go ahead despite protests

Tuesday 16 June 2015

Ministers say Waterfront must go ahead despite protests

Tuesday 16 June 2015


Taxpayers will lose millions if work on the new finance centre does not go ahead immediately, say the Council of Ministers.

With public disquiet mounting about the controversial development – and more than 100 Islanders protesting this morning as Members arrived in the States for a last-minute debate on a short delay – ministers have said that there is no time to wait until the end of the month for an independent Scrutiny report.

And they say that holding off, even for a few weeks, would break legally-binding agreements signed by the States’ development company and give Jersey a reputation as an unreliable partner to do business with.

jifc_protest.jpg

Their comments come ahead of the debate on Deputy Montfort Tadier’s proposition to stop work ahead of a Scrutiny report – expected by the end of the month – has been published, and until the States give their approval again.

In their comments, the Council of Ministers say: “If we stop the development now, as the proposition asks, the States of Jersey Development Company will suffer significant financial losses. In line with States decisions, they have entered into legally binding agreements to let premises, to borrow money, and to construct Building 4.

“Perhaps even more importantly, our reputation as a reliable partner for business would be fundamentally compromised. We should not place ourselves in a position where the democratically elected Assembly makes decisions, contracts are entered into, and then we have to break those contracts because the Legislature changes its mind."

Last month, it was announced that after years of delays and missed deadlines, work on the Waterfront finance centre was finally due to start after UBS signed a lease for part of the first of a planned six buildings. Local firm Camerons are due to construct the building, which will house UBS’s 200 staff.

But last year States Members and the public were told that work would only start when 200,000 square feet of offices – the equivalent of almost two entire buildings of the six-block development – had been signed up by tenants in secure contracts.

That commitment was originally given in 2009, but was repeated in February 2014 – six months before the last election.

Ministers have since said that the commitment was made by mistake, and that the 200,000 square foot threshold referred to a previous arrangement with private sector developers.

Sign up to newsletter

 

Comments

Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by david forde on
These incompetents use that in the hope the public swallow the story. They should be held accountable!
Posted by June OKeeffe on
This is a message to the public, in future do not support, give assistance to, opinionate or assist the states in any way - why - they dont care about the people of Jersey and tougher tactics must be found
Posted by nigel pearce on
Will the 'millions' we lose by delaying be more or less than the millions we shall lose by going ahead?
The public of Jersey have spoken. The States' members should listen to their wishes, not just to the voices of those with financial interests.
Posted by Simon Dodkins on
I do hope all those who voted in favour of this disaster have their new careers mapped out. I cannot imagine a single one of them being voted back in the next time they actually have to listen to us at election time. This is a disgusting display of the lack of willingness to listen to the public. They tell us if the development is stopping Jersey will be seen as an unreliable partner. So tell me, how will going ahead with the development look in respect to the governance of Jersey? How poorly will Jersey look to the outside world with respect to its elected officials actually representing the people? How will Jersey look when it is saddled with (another) white elephant?
Posted by Jon Needham on
A sad day where democracy has not had it's say. The Minister will ultimately bare the responsibility and be accountable. Yes the plan has in origins in 2002 but the world is a different place since 2008. More particularly the world of finance is demonstrably different.
Posted by Davey West on
June OKeeffe above is correct and we as family have discussed this. It is obvious that the Ministers and other politicians have their own personal agendas, and care nothing for working islanders. We have just sent back the latest social review, and suggest that they fill it in themselves as the states don't listen. Any correspondence from the states and St Helier Town Hall, will be sent without the post code or department being named.
All legal, let us see what happens in the near future when the rest of the population becomes unhelpful. Oh yes, we will pay our St Helier rates and all accounts at the end of the allowed time. Certainly not when the bill arrives as we normally do. Silly politicians.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?