Tuesday 01 December 2020
Select a region

EXPRESS OPINION: is that it?

EXPRESS OPINION: is that it?

Wednesday 21 October 2020

EXPRESS OPINION: is that it?

So, there it is. We have a proposed Migration Policy. It has been the key issue in Jersey politics for at least the last 20 years, and the stick which has been used to beat successive Ministers, and Committee Presidents before them.

Without clarity on the desired scale on the island’s population, how can we resolve the education, health, housing, infrastructure, economic and environmental issues which all stand before us?

But precisely because it is such a pivotal question, it is one which the island has been unable to answer. That continues, until we are now told, at least 2022. 

We now have some proposed migration controls, which the Chief Minister says, will actually give officials the tools to the job…whatever the island decides that job to be. 

He also admitted, for the first time in recent political history, that our current (and previous) controls were not fit for purpose – for the simple fact that they allow permissions to be ‘recycled;’ essentially, passed onto someone else.

Migration Population Policy 2

Pictured: Jersey's population growth.

In recent years we have thankfully moved on from an obsession with a magic number, as if 100,000 people is somehow fine, but 101,000 isn’t…and once you reach 99,999 people (as if you could even measure that precisely, in ‘real-time’) do you have a ‘one in, one out’ policy, like some back-street nightclub. Ridiculous.

But we haven’t moved on from setting targets, which are then repeatedly smashed, and being told that we have the controls to do the job, when we clearly don’t. 

Consider these words from the official 2011 States proposition which created the system we currently have:

“…contradictory objectives remain between the need to manage immigration more firmly, the protection of local housing and jobs, support for employers, and better housing rights for migrants. The challenge is to balance these objectives, and this Law gives the States and their appointed Minister the controls to do this.”

Apparently, that’s not true. The Chief Minister told us yesterday that it actually does nothing of the sort. It doesn’t give us “the controls to do this” at all.  

Which means that on THE most critical issue in Jersey - a description often confirmed by various public surveys – we have so far been caught short…again.

John Le Fondré Migration conference.jpeg

Pictured: The Chief Minister at this week's media briefing.

But this time, it’s all different! The new proposed controls will change all that. Finally, we will have controls which will enable a “responsive” and “transparent” system (please can someone describe it as “agile” just to complete the set?), perhaps putting Ministers in the position of a fighter pilot, with a comprehensive array of up-to-date information in front of them (surely a “dashboard”), precise controls to effect the most minute of course corrections, and laser-guided missiles to (“dynamically?”) hit the desired target. Hurrah! Dig out the Aviator sunglasses, all is well. 

Now, all we have to decide is what that target is. Because that is still completely missing. We still don’t know how to balance the “contradictory objectives” mentioned above. We still don’t know how to balance the needs of the environment and the economy, and if they even need to be in opposition. We still don't know if the island can support the people it needs to deliver a decent standard of living for all. People follow prosperity, with the reverse also true – there are examples within our own Channel Islands of that.

So, scrap the fanfare, and pack up the bunting. Put the fireworks back in their box, and send the covid-muffled bands home. We still don’t have a population policy. We still don’t know what we want. But we have new controls; which are apparently better that the old controls. Somehow, it's all very 2020. 

Sign up to newsletter



Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by Paul Troalic on
Why on earth is everyone making such a big issue out of sorting this niggly problem.
Of course there has to be a finite number otherwise we will continually find ourselves in this ridiculous situation.
The only issues that are important are 1) Will the immigrant have a positive impact on the Island and 2) will this person make a positive contribution to our tax revenues.
If both these criteria are met and by allowing this person residence we will not exceed our maximum number of people in the Island then this is acceptable.
The present infrastructure will not continually support a larger and larger population.
We also have to consider the impact an increasing population will have on the Island in terms of its indigenous population. Uncomfortable as it might seem the indigenous population is white and we have to consider if we really want the population to change from this.
The other factor that needs to be carefully thought through is that immigrants do not come alone so with no controls or limits the population could swell uncontrollably.
I understand that control in terms of family members only applies to temporary permits.
Is this all we want controlled? What about executives that come on say a five year contract. Will this apply to them also?
This issue has dragged on long enough and the Island is ruined because of it. Someone needs to get a tad tougher.
Posted by nigel pearce on
We have constantly been told that for the prosperity of the island, we have to have an increase in population. What has this increase achieved? Nothing worthwhile it seems. We have had an enormous number of ugly buildings, the encroachment on our open space and much more pressure on all our systems.
People don't seem much happier to me. I was lucky to be a teen and twenty year old in the sixties and I can assure you that with a population of about sixty-five thousand, life was much more relaxed. I don't remember any pupil of my schools having mental problems, though wether this is due to the number of experts now making a living for themselves
Posted by Private Individual on
They have no intention whatsoever of controlling immigration.

The level set in 2005 was 160,000 which was decided on how much free space was available on the island and the amount of immigration the island could take. Successive governments have not changed from the policy which was set out by Frank Walker and the government at the time.

The mantra was " Go for Growth" if you remember, and it was go for growth at any cost.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?