Sunday 01 October 2023
Select a region

Critical £800m hospital decision to clash with elections

Critical £800m hospital decision to clash with elections

Wednesday 23 June 2021

Critical £800m hospital decision to clash with elections

Wednesday 23 June 2021

Delays to the £800m new hospital project mean that the final decision now falls during the election period, so might have to be taken by an outgoing Minister or senior civil servant...or wait until a new Government is in place.

It was confirmed in a Treasury report earlier this month that the plan to build a new health facility at Overdale is now around three months behind schedule.

The delays, which have been blamed on questions around the new access route, mean that a planning application is now likely to only be put forward in November.

With a full public Planning Inquiry conducted by an independent inspector needing to take place after that, the final decision is now due to fall during purdah – the pre-election period during which time Government Ministers are not allowed to make any decisions or announcements that could be politically advantageous to them in the forthcoming election.

Senator Kristina Moore, who is Chair of a panel reviewing the future hospital project, grilled the project’s political lead, Deputy Chief Minister Senator Lyndon Farnham, on the matter at her panel’s latest hearing.

After Senator Farnham confirmed that the decision was likely to fall in the election period, she asked whether he felt such a significant decision being made at this time followed the “spirit and wording” of purdah restrictions. 


Pictured: Future Hospital Review Panel Chair Senator Kristina Moore queried whether taking such a major decision at election time in June was against the "spirit" of purdah.

He replied that discussions were underway “about how government is conducted during that period, whether it be limited powers afforded to existing ministers or the power transferred to States Members who are not seeking re-election or indeed delegation to senior officers of certain functions.”

Senator Moore then questioned whether, as the Minister responsible for the project, he felt it “acceptable that such a major decision for the island” could be made by “unelected” people or outgoing politicians who “won’t be held accountable”. 

He responded that he didn’t personally feel it was “appropriate to delegate that outside of the political sphere”, adding that his preference would be to have a decision taken earlier or leave it for the new Government.


Pictured: Senator Farnham, who has political responsibility for the hospital project, said that his preference would be for this Government or a new one to have the final say on the hospital.

No changes to the final approval system have been made as yet, meaning the decision currently remains with the Environment Minister, Deputy John Young, who turned down the previous hospital planning application following a public inquiry.

Deputy Young, who is not seeking re-election, told Express he understood that making a decision on what is set to be Jersey’s largest ever capital project might be classified as “business as usual” or “consolidation of existing business” by Government, allowing him to do so during purdah.

He emphasised that he had remained separate from the project design process to avoid any regulatory conflict, with his only involvement being the issuing of planning guidance – principles that he expects the design to follow.

Deputy Young also said that it was important that the role of the short-term Island Plan was not forgotten.

“This is a potential complication –the draft Island Pan is out for consultation at the moment. There will be an inquiry in October. [It] includes the preferred site for the hospital to be based at Overale and the access thereon. That Island Plan is open to both States Member amendments up until the middle of next month and public representations… The final plan on the Island Plan will be made in March. I’m entirely dependent on States Members approving that before we get to purdah.”

He added: “There is no latitude in the timetable – it is critical, it is all fixed.”

Sign up to newsletter



Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by Martin on
It MUST be better to wait for a new Government to be in place after the problems " SOME" of this Gov,t have caused!

AND what is going to do more harm - 1) delaying medical assistance to the public by not expediting the hospital - or 2) Delaying the prompt exit of some of the politicians that NEED to be ousted at the next election!

Catch 22?
Posted by john garner on
Its almost as if the powers that be are trying to "game" the next election ...assuming they dont find a way of stopping the election
Posted by Scott Mills on
What happens if the decisions made by the top elite politicians (the untouchables) don't get in after this election. Do they then put their friends in postions which public has no say over.
Posted by gordon le claire on
again o why do they say it will cost x amount of millions when I wanted my house build I ask for a price .I certainly did not say to builders I have this much money to spend
Posted by gordon le claire on
sorry did I misread a civil servant could decide o no I do not think so we all know what will happen he will be instructed to approve it or risk losing his job if the ministers we have now get back in.
it is not the job of public employees to decide it is for the government to do what the taxpayers want.
Posted by Jon Jon on
What a complete mess this new hospital is getting into, driven by the deluded Farnham.Most people know that this site is the most expensive route, will glad to see back of some of these so called politicians who sit on the council of ministers, we need to attract a far better person into the states ,not these throw cash about as if it grows on trees!
Posted by on
Farnhams folly continues at pace!

It is only common sense that this decision should wait until after the next election, that way Farnham and Le Fondre will be able to test the electorate's support for this project. If they get in so be it.

If not the new politicians will at least have a chance of stopping this folly once and for all.
Posted by Paul Troalic on
Clearly the election is looming and the project is stalling.
The whole sad fiasco should be held over until the new Assembly is elected. Wrong place, wrong budget.
Farnham has cocked this up by his belligerence in pressing ahead without the support of the public.
Even some of the politicians are getting cold feet but dare not say so.
It is a damn mess. Pause the whole project until after the election and appoint people that know the Island to get the project completed in the best location.
Posted by on
The decision should not be left to a departing deputy who has stated that he does not intend to seek re-election.

His decision will affect everyone that lives here and should be taken by the new government. As we have seen by his "interim" island plan he has no respect for Jersey or its countryside. He had all the opportunities to put propositions in to stop the rampant increase in population but has done nothing in his time in office for the people of Jersey.

He has only passed more huge developments and continues to do so.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?