Saturday 24 February 2024
Select a region

Politicians bat away last-ditch attempt to save Senators

Politicians bat away last-ditch attempt to save Senators

Thursday 22 April 2021

Politicians bat away last-ditch attempt to save Senators

Thursday 22 April 2021

The States Assembly has swatted away a last-ditch attempt to save the role of Senator.

Yesterday, States Members voted by 31 votes to 16 to end the 72-year-old island-wide mandate, endorsing a decision made in December to move to a two-role Assembly and introduce ‘super-constituencies’ for Deputies.

Two long-serving Senators – External Relations Minister Ian Gorst and Economic Development Minister Lyndon Farnham – tried, but failed, to amend the law that will bring in significant electoral reform in time for next year’s election, proposed for 22 June 2022.

They got more support than December’s 43-3 vote on the principles of the law, winning the backing of Chief Minister John Le Fondré along the way, but it was not enough to turn the tide of parliamentary opinion to eject the eight Senators in favour of an Assembly of 49 Members, made up of 37 elected deputies from nine new districts of comparable population size, plus the 12 Constables.

Gorst Farnham.jpeg

Pictured: Senators Ian Gorst and Lyndon Farnham led the fight to keep the Senators in the States.

The Senators argued that those who hold the highest office should be chosen by – and be accountable to – the whole island. They also argued that the Senator role was the fairest and most equitable way of choosing a politician, it was the easiest role to understand, and most islanders did not want to lose the island-wide mandate.

They said that once the Senators were gone, the Constables would be next for the chop.

“We have one Assembly – there is no 'upper house' and the Senators represent national interests in the Chamber,” said Senator Farnham. “The system has been carefully thought out to provide sustainable form of government with one chamber. 

“Instead, we have a rush to embrace anglicisation of our political system and, I’m afraid, some people will not be happy until we have a carbon copy of the UK.”

But a majority of Members spoke in support of the electoral reforms, many arguing that the Assembly was ending 20 years of inaction and finally enacting the winning ‘Option B’ of the 2013 referendum, which proposed losing the Senators and moving to larger constituencies.

Deputy Carina Alves, whose Privileges and Procedures Committee (PPC) proposed the changes, said: “In December last year came a breakthrough – the strongest vote in support of real electoral change the Assembly has seen in decades. 

“It is now within our grasp to demonstrate that we are listening, we can put the voter first by offering a fairer, simpler system and we will repair the damage done to this Assembly’s relationship with its people, when their referendum vote was ignored."


Pictured: Deputy Carina Alves’ Privileges and Procedures Committee proposed the reforms.

She continued: ”The change to the composition of the Assembly and the electoral districts represents a significant shift. International standards and best practice dictate such change should be implemented no later than 12 months before the date of the next election, which we can comfortably do today.

“PPC is poised to launch a campaign informing the electorate of what the changes mean to them, and how the new system will work.

“We want to reach out to potential candidates, well before the election, to let them know what is involved so they are as prepared as possible.  

“We want to urge all those who have given up on us after the 2013 referendum – to come back into the fold. 

“We want to explain the new simplicity to those who found the old system confusing and off-putting. And, nearer the election time, we want to encourage everyone to do their duty – and vote.”

While Senator Gorst did not succeed in his bid to save the Senators, States Members did agree this morning with him that States Members should remaining office until new or re-elected Members are sworn in, and Ministers until a new Council of Ministers is formed, to ensure continuity.

However, they rejected his proposal to hold Election Day on 18 May 2022.

In a final vote around midday, politicians finalised plans to legally change the constitution of the States Assembly, meaning Senators will be removed, the number of Deputies will increase to 37 and the General Election will be held on 22 June 2022.

Sign up to newsletter



Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by gordon le claire on
The Senators are wrong all states members should be held to account not just a few
Posted by Guy de Faye on
The abolishing of Jersey's Senators is nothing short of a massive democratic disaster. 

Local voters polling at next year's General Election will discover that 8 of their limited number of votes have gone missing - importantly the votes that generally dictate which candidates (mainly consisting of established States Members) are likely to take up ministerial roles. This loss may be partly compensated by acquiring one or two extra Deputy candidates to vote for, but voter options have been reduced.

The standard of debate in the Assembly was, bar a few speeches, abysmal and delusional. A stream of States Members exposed a total lack of comprehension on how our local electoral system functions, supporting their arguments with, as an example, purported proofs based on fundamental failures to interpret and understand poll results. 

There was a pervading obsession with the value of individual votes being "equally weighted" across the Island, which completely overlooked the fact that each "super constituency" will have different candidates. It will be obvious to most readers that when you are voting for different candidates in separate locations, the comparison of "vote weight" across the Island becomes entirely irrelevant. 

It was additionally and sadly farcical to listen to members being determined to introduce a new "fairer, simpler system", by eradicating the format that gave all voters in Jersey, the same choice of candidate options, backed by the same number of votes to exercise! The most simple and fair procedure possible.
Posted by gordon le claire on
thinking more about it the way states members vote effects the whole island so maybe all the people of jersey should vote for who gets in on an island wide vote not districts or just senators but everyone
Posted by nigel pearce on
It should have been the Constables that should have been removed from the States, not Senators.
Posted by Keith Marsh on
Welcome to Mini UK ~ as usual Jersey States Members have got it WRONG. ~ our Political System is what helps to make Jersey, Jersey. You can bet after Senators have gone, the must change it brigade, will then turn on Constables.
WAKE UP members of our Government ~ you are like turkeys voting for Christmas.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?