A reader is suggesting an increase in the maximum height of accommodation in built-up areas to help solve the housing crisis.
The suggestion comes from Edward Trevor, who chaired the Planning Committee and the Health and Housing Committee in the London Borough of Sutton, as well as leading the Conservative Group on the former Association of Metropolitan Authorities Housing Committee, before moving to Jersey in the early 2000s.
Frustrated by a lack of Ministerial response to his idea, Mr Trevor had this to say...
"I thought that with the development in the town area and the need to protect the green spaces for agriculture - mainly potatoes and cows - it would be appropriate to increase the height of buildings in some parts of the Island, particularly St. Helier and the town areas of St. Saviour and St. Clement to 12 storeys or even more.
Pictured: Mr Trevor thinks parts of the island should hold 12-storey buildings due to the need to protect green spaces.
With the Le Masurier development in Bath Street, an opportunity has been lost and there are other instances where action could have been taken. Now that Andium is proposing to develop a number of sites over the next three years or so, more could be done if at least some of these were high-rise.
With most people in Jersey wanting to retain the green areas, that is the only way to be able to house people decently. Whether private or social, the housing needs to be of good quality and to a proper size standard as all deserve to be able to live in decent conditions.
Although most people seem to be against the increase in population, there has been an average increase of over 1,000 per annum over the last few years and all need to be housed. As it seems that the government is unable or unwilling to block immigration, action needs to be taken immediately.
Pictured: The rising population must be met with more housing, according to Mr Trevor.
The suggestion of high-rise was put to the Minister, John Young, three times by email over the last 18 months, but there has been no reaction at all.
Although the Island Plan is being updated, it is not an immovable feast and, with the approval of the States, surely amendments can be made where it is sensible and probably necessary to do so prior to a major review?
It is the duty of Ministers to reply to reasonable suggestions, and when chairman of a planning committee in London I always replied within three days to members and 10 working days to the public as laid down in Standing Orders.
Pictured: Mr Trevor says he has written to the Environment Minister several times.
This applied to virtually all letters received over almost 40 years as an elected member. Here, it seems that John Young ignores decent behaviour and doesn’t bother to reply. In my view, he is taking taxpayers' money under false pretences."
Edward Trevor, MBE FRICS IRRV (Hons)
9 Cobblestones, La Retraite, St. Helier
Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.
Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.