A new way of “planning, prioritising, and managing major projects” is being proposed.

Policy and Resources says its new ‘pipeline’ approach would put more emphasis on “good planning at an early stage”.

It will also allow the priority list to change as needed.


The new approach to the island’s ‘Major Projects Portfolio’ was announced towards the end of March and is due to be debated when the States sit for their meeting starting on 22 April.

If approved, the new approach will see Policy and Resources create a ‘pipeline’ of capital projects that need funding.

This pipeline will be variable with items moving up and down the priority list as things change.

P&R said this approach will avoid problems caused by the States committing money too soon, allowing departments to carry out early planning and development work without the States committing to the actual delivery of any project until everything has been assessed.

Pictured: P&R is behind the new proposals.

The committee believes this new method will also ensure the States take account of wider financial pressures when setting the major projects portfolio.

Ultimately it will mean funding is allocated to major projects alongside the Medium‑Term Financial Plan while also taking account of wider – current and future – financial pressures.

The current situation

The current Major Projects Portfolio already has a pipeline – but P&R says the new approach will offer more flexibility through that pipeline.

At the moment capital projects are divided into two categories – those labelled for ‘Delivery’ and those in the ‘Pipeline’.

Projects that are on the ‘Delivery’ list have been approved for funding and are moving through detailed planning and delivery. Current examples would include projects like the new Les Ozouets Campus and the ongoing development work at the Princess Elizabeth Hospital.

Projects currently in the ‘Pipeline’ include those that may be needed in the future but have not yet been approved for significant planning work or delivery. These projects do not currently have funding attached to them. Current examples would include the Dairy – which is widely acknowledged to need modernising and upgrading but has not yet been approved for funding.

Under the current system major capital projects can only be added to the ‘to do list’ at the start of a new political term when the States sets out its priorities for the coming four years.

P&R says this makes it harder to respond to new or changing needs and circumstances.

The new system

If the States back P&R’s new plan, the ‘Major Projects Portfolio’ would get a new prioritisation approach under three distinct stages – Proposal Development, Pipeline, and Delivery.

The committee says the pipeline stage would be “stronger and more structured” under the proposed system.

The three step system has been designed to ensure projects are “better developed and more clearly defined” at the Proposal Development stage.

P&R says this will help staff identify risks and costs earlier and manage any arising. issues more effectively.

Once a project reaches the pipeline it will be in the flexible priority list that will see projects moved up and down as circumstances change.

P&R says the “strengthened Pipeline creates a clear and structured way for projects to carry out early planning work, without committing money for delivery too early”.

“In particular, projects will not be expected to provide firm cost estimates until they are well developed and ready to be considered for the Delivery stage of the Portfolio.”

P&R says this is an important point as it will address a long‑standing problem where early cost estimates were produced before projects were properly planned, and those early figures then became difficult to change.

“By waiting until projects are better defined, the revised approach leads to cost information that is more reliable, realistic, and easier to compare when decisions are made.

“More generally, the revised approach gives decision‑makers better information, helps risks and links between projects to be identified earlier, allows new proposals to come forward more smoothly over time, and ensures that people and funding are only committed once projects are ready.”

The Delivery stage is the final part of the process and will see projects being signed off for completion.

The Pipeline

50 projects have already been assessed for possible inclusion in the new – strengthened and more flexible – pipeline.

Of those, 26 projects have been recommended for inclusion in the new pipeline.

The projects are listed alphabetically.

They’ve been chosen based on their scores against agreed assessment criteria including around need, cost, and viability.

The 26 projects proposed for inclusion in the pipeline now all scored the highest points against the agreed assessment criteria. Further project proposals will be added to the pipeline on an ongoing basis, said P&R, if they meet the agreed prioritisation criteria.

The pipeline projects

The 26 projects recommended for inclusion in the pipeline, if the new scheme is adopted, cover a range of services.

You can read P&R’s description of each project by clicking on the links below.

We have also listed which States committee or department the project comes under.

The projects are listed alphabetically.

Affordable Housing Development Programme

This comes under the Committee for Housing.

The scheme supports the delivery of affordable housing, including social rentals, shared ownership, specialist housing and emergency housing. It does this by providing financial support, in full or in part, to help bring sites forward for development to meet identified housing needs.

This scheme represents the next phase of the wider Affordable Housing Programme.

The first phase is already included in the delivery stage of the portfolio and contributes directly to the Government Work Plan outcomes of ‘Sufficient Housing’ and ‘Safe and Secure’.

Alderney Airport Control Tower Solution

This comes under the States Trading Supervisory Board.

The structure has reached the end of its operational life, and continued use was only considered as sustainable for a further 18 to 24 months from October 2024. Funding has recently been approved through Routine Capital to carry out temporary reinforcement works, extending its use by a further two to three years.

This solution is temporary in nature and does not provide a long‑term fix. For this reason, the States’ Trading Supervisory Board wishes to continue with the major projects submission to secure a permanent solution. The scheme is critical to the long‑term sustainability of Alderney Airport and is essential to maintaining reliable air links and access to medical care in Guernsey.

Alderney Airport – Airport Terminal, Fire Station and Ancillary Buildings

This comes under the States Trading Supervisory Board.

Condition surveys have been completed for the airport terminal, fire station, store block and office building. All four buildings have been assessed as being beyond the end of their operational life. If any of these buildings were to fail, Alderney Airport would be unable to continue operating.

This scheme seeks to address the required repairs or, where necessary, the replacement of the aerodrome buildings to ensure the airport can continue to operate safely and effectively. The scheme has been ranked highly due to the risks it addresses and its strong alignment with Government Work Plan outcomes.

Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Technology Development Programme

This comes under the Committee for Home Affairs.

This initiative aims to strengthen the Bailiwick’s approach to managing financial crime risk by improving digital systems and supporting closer working between agencies.

It builds on earlier work by improving how information is collected, stored, analysed, reported and governed, creating a more effective and joined‑up framework for preventing financial crime.

The scheme supports the “Foundations for our Future” priority by helping Guernsey remain competitive as an international financial centre and meet increasingly demanding international standards.

Autoclaves

This comes under the Committee for Health and Social Care.

While other parts of the department were refurbished as part of OHM Phase 1, the autoclaves were not replaced. The existing autoclaves do not meet current UK Department of Health and Social Care guidance or European manufacturing standards.

This scheme will replace these essential autoclave machines, which are used to sterilise surgical instruments. The replacement is critical to maintaining safe surgical services and ensuring the island can continue to provide surgical procedures.

Beau Sejour Leisure Centre Re-Development/Rebuild (Beau Sejour Review) 

This comes under the Committee for Education, Sport, and Culture.

A review is currently underway to assess whether Beau Sejour should continue to operate as a multi‑functional civic asset. The review is considering options to repurpose underused spaces, co‑locate additional services, or rebuild the facility to better meet community needs.

Any of these options would require investment to ensure that the facility’s current social value is maintained and, where possible, enhanced for the future.

Complex Residential & Education on Island 

This comes under the Committee for Health and Social Care.

The scheme seeks to address the growing risk of more young people disengaging from education due to increasingly complex needs that require specialist and intensive support. It contributes directly to the GWP Priority ‘Agree and Advance a Sustainable Health and Care System’ and supports the ‘Place to Grow and Succeed’ outcome within the ‘Foundations of our Future’ area of focus.

Fontaine Vinery Infrastructure

This comes under the Policy and Resources Committee.

To support wider estate rationalisation and enable the Guernsey Development Agency’s plans to relocate tenants from Griffiths Yard, investment in the Fontaine Vinery site is required. Relocating industrial users to this site would help free up other areas for redevelopment or alternative uses.

Digital & Technology Infrastructure Refresh

This comes under the Policy and Resources Committee.

This scheme will update IT hardware across the organisation, including servers, networks and other specialist systems. Many of these assets have reached, or exceeded, their recommended lifespan and now need to be replaced.

As the existing Master Services Agreement has ended, the States will put new agreements in place to support this work. The scheme is essential to maintaining day‑to‑day operations and is a key enabler of the Government Work Plan outcome for ‘Digital Government’.

Future Harbours Strategy (Including Pool Marina and Fuel Supply)

This comes under the Policy and Resources Committee.

Ports need additional land and facilities to continue operating effectively in the future, meet international standards and manage areas of existing risk. Work is underway to assess the wider strategic and economic benefits of developing the harbours and marinas.

This includes reviewing options for harbour infrastructure and future arrangements for hydrocarbon importation. This work will inform the Guernsey Development Agency’s plans, including the proposed removal of ‘not always afloat but safely aground’ (NAABSA) vessels from St Sampson’s Harbour, which is a key step in enabling wider regeneration of the area.

The scheme also presents an opportunity to expand Guernsey’s marina offer by providing a 24‑hour access marina, increasing berth numbers and upgrading facilities to match the standards of nearby jurisdictions. The scheme is identified in the Government Work Plan as a super priority under the ‘Fit for Purpose Infrastructure’ outcome and offers wider economic benefits.

 Guernsey Airport Aerodrome Radar

This comes under the States’ Trading Supervisory Board.

Guernsey Airport’s aerodrome provides radar services for Guernsey and Alderney and a back‑up service for Jersey. This equipment is essential to air traffic control but is nearing the end of its operational life and will no longer be supported after 2029.

If the radar were to fail, air traffic control at Guernsey Airport would be unable to operate and services would need to be safely shut down. Work is underway to develop a Surveillance Strategy to identify the available replacement options.

This project forms part of the Bailiwick Air Navigation Systems (BANS) programme and is critical to maintaining air links for Guernsey, Alderney and the wider Channel Islands.

 Guernsey Airport – Air Traffic Control (ATC) Centre and Contingency Suite

This comes under the States’ Trading Supervisory Board.

Guernsey Airport’s air navigation facilities, equipment and services have exceeded their intended lifespan. Without these systems, the airport would be unable to operate, directly affecting the island’s economy, access to healthcare and overall connectivity.

The Bailiwick Air Navigation Systems (BANS) programme will assess the condition and suitability of the existing infrastructure, confirm minimum operational requirements and future needs, and repair or replace systems as required. The current lack of resilience in these systems exposes the airport to significant operational, regulatory and reputational risks, which this scheme is intended to address.

Guernsey Airport Terminal Building Roof 

This comes under the States Trading Supervisory Board.

The airport terminal roof has suffered several structural failures during high winds in recent years. A detailed survey is planned to confirm the extent of the required repairs, and scaffolding has been installed to allow close inspection. The scaffolding also provides temporary support to damaged sections of the roof.

Completing this work is essential to ensure the continued operation of the airport terminal. It is also important for the island’s reputation, as the airport is the first point of arrival for many visitors.

Home Affairs Estate Programme

This comes under the Committee for Home Affairs.

The Home Affairs Estate Rationalisation Project was identified as a pipeline project in the 2021 Government Work Plan and remained a priority following the 2023 reset of the Major Projects Portfolio. Many of the existing Home Affairs buildings are no longer fit for purpose and do not meet required standards, creating increasing operational and safety risks.

The custody suite at Police Headquarters does not meet Home Office design standards and presents safety risks to both detainees and staff. In addition, the prison currently houses children and adults within the same facility, which does not meet inspection standards and represents a significant compliance and safeguarding concern.

These issues create urgent risks that cannot be addressed through minor upgrades. The project is therefore considered critical, as it is required to ensure the continued safe, lawful and effective operation of Home Affairs services. The scheme aims to deliver compliant, well‑located facilities that are fit for purpose for at least the next 25 years.

Laboratory Development – including Mortuary

This comes under the Committee for Health & Social Care.

The current facilities are not suitable for existing levels of demand and are already failing to meet required standards. They are also not capable of supporting the expected increase in demand in the coming years. Both the laboratory and mortuary are non‑compliant, creating increasing operational and regulatory risks.

Without timely intervention, these issues could affect the safe and effective delivery of essential laboratory services. This scheme is therefore urgent and seeks to address these risks by providing a centralised, multi‑purpose laboratory on the Princess Elizabeth Hospital campus, alongside a new mortuary. This will ensure services can continue safely, meet required standards and cope with future demand.

New Bus Depot

This comes under the Committee for the Environment and Infrastructure.

To support the move to net zero by 2050 and improve bus services, a new bus depot is required to enable the electrification of the fleet. While only a small number of electric buses can currently be supported due to electricity capacity, the size and layout of the existing depot are also major constraints.

To move to a fully electric fleet, the depot will need to provide suitable garage and charging facilities, along with storage, office space, driver facilities, and wash and refuelling areas. A new or upgraded depot is therefore essential to support this transition and the long‑term operation of the bus service.

Pharmacy Development

This comes under the Committee for Health and Social Care.

This scheme involves refurbishing and re‑configuring the existing Pharmacy at the Princess Elizabeth Hospital and installing a dispensing robot. This will significantly improve patient safety by reducing reliance on manual dispensing and lowering the risk of prescribing and medication errors.

The scheme will also allow a wider range of medicines, including high‑cost drugs, to be dispensed safely within the hospital, helping to control costs. In addition, it will address constraints caused by outdated infrastructure, enabling safer, more efficient ways of working and strengthening the Pharmacy Service’s ability to meet current and future demand.

Power & Environmental Resilience

This comes under the Committee for Policy and Resources.

Reliable power and environmental resilience are essential to business continuity across the States’ estate. This programme was launched in response to a decline in compliance with business continuity requirements and incorporates recommendations from the PwC review following the SCFH server room incident and subsequent IT outages.

The aim of the scheme is to reduce risk by providing reliable emergency power to multiple sites. The current lack of capacity presents a significant risk to the continued operation of critical services, which this programme seeks to address.

Regeneration of the Bridge/Infrastructure for the North

This comes under the Policy & Resources Committee.

The Bridge and Braye du Valle Redevelopment is an existing scheme in the 2021–2025

Delivery Portfolio. Its focus has shifted from purchasing completed units to acquiring and clearing land to enable the delivery of essential infrastructure.

This proposal seeks to continue development in the northern area by putting the necessary infrastructure in place to unlock future development opportunities. By removing current constraints, the scheme creates the conditions for wider regeneration and more effective use of the site over time. It aligns with two of the ‘Foundations for our Future’ areas of focus and contributes to the super priority workstream of ‘Maximising Potential in States Assets’, including Leale’s Yard.

Smart Court Programme – Project 2 (Case Management) & Project 3 (Registrations & Digital Strongroom)

This comes under the Royal Court.

The current system is not suitable for a modern digital environment. The SMART Court Programme aims to modernise the Royal Court by using digital technology to improve the experience for service users. This will make court processes easier to understand, quicker to access and less complex, reducing delays and improving access for all users.

The programme will also support staff to work more efficiently, helping services run more smoothly and consistently. This work supports the ‘Digital Government’ outcome within the ‘Island Resilience’ area of focus and will improve the States’ overall digital services.

Project 1, Court Presentation, is now well advanced, and training is underway to support the transition into day‑to‑day operations.

States Employee Housing

This comes under the Committee for Policy and Resources.

Much of the rented accommodation currently used for States employee housing does not offer good value for money. In addition, some of the States‑owned properties are no longer suitable and need to be upgraded, refurbished or considered for exit and disposal.

This scheme seeks to secure funding for government employee housing, enabling the Strategic Property Unit to manage the States employee housing stock more effectively.

This includes bringing forward suitable, operationally aligned properties, including schemes that the Guernsey Housing Association does not currently have the capacity to deliver.

Providing appropriate States employee housing is essential to attracting and retaining staff who are critical to the delivery of the States’ most vital services.

The Haven

This comes under the Committee for Health & Social Care.

Secure accommodation at The Haven serves two purposes: supporting children on remand and providing specialist accommodation for young people who pose a risk to themselves or others. Demand for both has increased over the past two years, alongside a significant rise in harmful sexual behaviour and offending by young people in the Bailiwick.

The current facility is not fit for purpose and is increasingly unable to meet this growing and complex demand. This scheme seeks to identify how the Bailiwick can provide improved secure accommodation, while making the best use of available resources.

Addressing this need is essential to protecting vulnerable young people, managing risk effectively, and supporting a safe and secure population.

The States of Guernsey Digital Strategy


This comes under the Committee for Policy and Resources.

The Digital Strategy depicts the objectives of transforming our government services through digital innovation, outlining the principles that will guide the development of new digital services.

The strategy sets the direction and principles that will guide future digital investment.

Once agreed, it will inform the development of individual digital projects that deliver tangible improvements for service users, staff and the wider organisation. In this way, the strategy acts as the foundation for delivering consistent, high‑quality digital services an achieving the States’ wider digital and service improvement outcomes.

Future Inert Waste Solution (transitional scheme)

This comes under the States’ Trading Supervisory Board.

The current inert waste facility has reached the end of its operational life. Without timely action, the States face increasing operational and compliance risks, including continued reliance on temporary measures.

This project proposes the development of a new inert waste facility to ensure the Waste Disposal Authority can continue to meet its statutory duty to provide appropriate waste infrastructure for the island. A policy letter was debated in May 2025, after which the States agreed to reclaim land at Black Rock for the new facility and to designate Les Vardes Quarry solely for water storage.

Developing the new facility is therefore urgent to maintain compliant waste operations and avoid further disruption to construction activity and the wider economy.

SAP Roadmap Programme (transitional scheme)

This comes under the Committee for Policy and Resources.

Licensing and support for the current SAP system will begin to reduce from 2027, with no further improvements available and only limited support provided at additional cost. By 2030, the system will be fully out of support.

If the system is not replaced, the States would face increasing operational, financial and security risks, including a greater likelihood of system failures and disruption to critical services. This scheme therefore seeks to replace SAP with a fit‑for‑purpose system that provides a reliable, supported platform to meet the needs of users and the organisation into the future.

Future Guernsey Dairy Solution (transitional scheme)

This comes under the States’ Trading Supervisory Board.

The project aims to design, build and bring into operation a modern and resilient dairy on a new site. This is essential to securing the long‑term continuity of on‑island milk and dairy production, reducing reliance on ageing infrastructure and ensuring the island can continue to meet quality and regulatory standards.

By providing a fit‑for‑purpose facility, the scheme strengthens the resilience of the local dairy supply, safeguards food security, and supports a sustainable, reliable operation for the long term.

Transitional projects

The final three projects in the list above are highlighted as ‘transitional’ projects.

P&R suggests these projects sit within the pipeline but be allowed to move beyond early strategic planning and continue into more detailed planning because of their ‘critical’ position.

The committee said the ‘Future Inert Waste Solution’, the ‘SAP Roadmap’, and the ‘Future Guernsey Dairy Solution’ are all “critical to the continued running of States services, and allowing planning work to continue avoids unnecessary delay while the revised portfolio arrangements are put in place”.

The Future Inert Waste Solution – this involves the planned land reclamation project at Black Rock, while using Les Verdes Quarry for fresh water storage.

The SAP Roadmap Programme – this initiative will see more of the States’ digital services upgraded.

The Future Dairy Programme – this covers essential work needed at the current Guernsey Dairy site.

If these three projects are highlighted as critical it doesn’t mean they will definitely proceed though.

P&R said these projects won’t move into delivery at this stage, but they will progress through the planning stages and will return to the States so a decision can be made on funding or implementing them.

Project Delivery

The final stage of the system will be the ‘delivery’ of the prioritised projects that have been approved by the States with funding allocated and approved.

P&R says the Delivery stage will initially consist mainly of projects that were already included in the Delivery category of the 2021–25 Portfolio.

How and when each of the projects are funded in the future will be down to the States too, using the Medium‑Term Financial Plan (MTFP) to plan spending.

P&R says, through the MTFP, the States will be asked to agree how much they want to spend in total on major projects and how this spending should be funded. As projects are prioritised they will be included in the Delivery stage of the Portfolio and the States will be asked to agree funding at that stage, for each project individually.

The MyGov mistakes

Funding the prioritised projects will run into hundreds of millions of pounds – funded by tax payers and other revenue raising measures.

The States hasn’t got an entirely glowing record when it comes to spending that much money though.

With recent projects such as the MyGov and Revenue Service IT projects costing a combined £42million – and both being described as failures – the States will be under increased scrutiny when to comes to signing off on new projects.

There is also the hospital redevelopment, which saw millions of pounds spent on a new wing which has yet to open to patients.

P&R says lessons are and will be learnt from these issues though.

“The approach also recognises that reviews of major projects, including MyGov, are ongoing. Relevant learning from these reviews will be incorporated into the Portfolio framework and decision‑making process once the findings are available.”

Oversight

With the above in mind, P&R wants members of the public to ensure the new method of prioritising capital projects is working as it should.

If approved by the States, this way of working will be adopted immediately and P&R wants people who can provide “independent insight and constructive challenge to the board responsible for overseeing major government projects” to get involved.

They’re offering ‘voluntary Portfolio Assurance Adviser’ roles to people wanting to work with the States on “some of Guernsey’s most significant and complex programmes, which include construction, digital projects and other investment in the island’s public infrastructure”.

They will be expected to commit up to two days per month and would be expected to take up this role for one year, with the possibility of an extension.

P&R ideally wants people with senior-level experience, either in an executive or non-executive role, who have led organisational change, large project management or major improvement initiatives. They should also have experience in assurance, governance and oversight, with applications welcome from any sector.

Deputy St Pier, Vice-President of the Policy & Resources Committee, said: “States Committees are responsible for delivering hugely significant projects for our island, significant not just in their cost, but also in their value to islanders’ lives.

“Given the significant problems experienced with the MyGov and Revenue Service projects, P&R recognise the need to strengthen the oversight and governance of capital projects in the future. Having independent challenge is not a threat and should be welcomed. We think it’s important to have a different perspective from outside of government. The right individuals with the right expertise will be able to really add value and contribute to the community through this role.”

Boley Smillie, Chief Executive & Head of the Public Service said: “Major projects shape the island we live in, and islanders quite rightly expect them to be delivered well. Independent oversight brings an important added dimension to that work. We’re keen to hear from experienced local professionals who can bring the kind of independent perspective that supports strong, confident project delivery.”

Anyone interested should send a CV and a short statement outlining their relevant experience and what they would bring to the role to policyandresources@gov.gg by Monday 20th April.

More information about this opportunity is available at gov.gg/PBAdvisor.